Literature DB >> 12091820

Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis.

Göran Dellgren1, Tirone E David, Ehud Raanani, Susan Armstrong, Joan Ivanov, Harry Rakowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif), which has been used in our institution since 1984.
METHODS: From January 1984 to December 1995, the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis was used for aortic valve replacement in 254 patients (male/female ratio 117:137) with a mean age of 71 years (range 25-87 years). Before the operation, 216 patients (85%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The predominant diagnosis was aortic stenosis (n = 219, 86%). Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 130 cases (51%), mitral valve replacement in 11 cases (4%), and tricuspid or mitral valve repair in 12 cases (5%). Previous cardiac operations had been performed in 36 cases (14%). Follow-up was 100% complete at a mean of 60 +/- 31 months. Univariate estimates of time-related cumulative probabilities were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable adjustment was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Echocardiography was performed in 61% of long-term survivors.
RESULTS: There were 11 early deaths (4%) and 58 late deaths. Actuarial survivals at 5, 10, and 12 years were 80% +/- 3%, 50% +/- 8%, and 36% +/- 9%, respectively. At 12 years the freedom from cardiac death was 73% +/- 7%, the freedom from valve-related death was 84% +/- 11%, the freedom from valve reoperation was 83% +/- 9%, the freedom from primary tissue failure was 86% +/- 9%, the freedom from thromboembolism was 67% +/- 13%, and the freedom from endocarditis was 98% +/- 1%. Echocardiography was performed on long-term survivors (mean follow-up 67 +/- 25 months) and showed that transvalvular peak and mean pressure differences measured with Doppler echocardiography were 23.2 +/- 9.6 and 12.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, respectively. Aortic regurgitation was found by Doppler echocardiography to be none or trivial, mild, moderate, and severe in 64%, 30%, 3%, and 1% of patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass index was 107.2 +/- 35.3 g/m(2) (118.9 +/- 40.2 g/m(2) in men and 98.8 +/- 28.8 g/m(2) in women) at late follow-up. One third of all patients, regardless of sex (n = 26/64 women and n = 14/45 men), had evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, our analyses indicate that the residual left ventricular hypertrophy was not caused by valve mismatch but was probably multifactorial.
CONCLUSION: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis has provided satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic outcome. However, at long-term follow-up about one third of the patients being investigated still had left ventricular hypertrophy examined by echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091820     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2002.121672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  14 in total

1.  Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve in middle-aged patients: comparison with the St. Jude Medical valve.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Hiroshi Okuyama; Shinichi Ishii; Takahiro Inoue; Katsushi Kinouchi; Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-09

Review 2.  EMT-inducing biomaterials for heart valve engineering: taking cues from developmental biology.

Authors:  M K Sewell-Loftin; Young Wook Chun; Ali Khademhosseini; W David Merryman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Primary echocardiographic results of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna.

Authors:  Hiroki Mizoguchi; Masayuki Sakaki; Kazushige Inoue; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Takashi Iwata; Yasuo Suehiro; Takuya Miura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation mean the end of surgical aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Michael J Mack
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

Review 5.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 6.  Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan.

Authors:  Eiki Tayama; Kosuke Saku; Tomoyuki Anegawa; Atsunobu Oryoji; Shinya Negoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Approach to the patient with bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aorta aneurysm.

Authors:  José T Ortiz; David D Shin; Nalini M Rajamannan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

8.  Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience.

Authors:  Angelo M Dell'Aquila; Dominik Schlarb; Stefan R B Schneider; Jürgen R Sindermann; Andreas Hoffmeier; Gerrit Kaleschke; Sven Martens; Andreas Rukosujew
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-15

Review 9.  Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Authors:  Joseph Huh; Faisal Bakaeen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Biological artificial valve dysfunction - single-centre, observational echocardiographic study in patients operated on before age 65 years.

Authors:  Marek Maciejewski; Katarzyna Piestrzeniewicz; Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa; Andrzej Walczak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.