Literature DB >> 12091658

CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction.

Rogier E van Gelder1, Henk W Venema, Iwo W O Serlie, C Yung Nio, Rogier M Determann, Corinne A Tipker, Frans M Vos, Afina S Glas, Joep F W Bartelsman, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Johan S Laméris, Jaap Stoker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of polyp detection and the image quality of computed tomographic (CT) colonography at different radiation dose levels and to study effective doses reported in literature on CT colonography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonography and colonoscopy were performed with 100 mAs in 50 consecutive patients at high risk for colorectal cancer; 50- and 30-mAs CT colonographic examinations were simulated with controlled addition of noise to raw transmission measurements. One radiologist randomly evaluated all original and simulated images for the presence of polyps and scored image quality. Differences in image quality were assessed with the Wilcoxon rank test. Scan protocols from the literature and recent (unpublished) updates were collected.
RESULTS: In nine of 10 patients with polyps 5 mm in diameter or larger (sensitivity, 90%) and in seven of 17 patients with polyps smaller than 5 mm, polyps were correctly identified with CT colonography at all dose levels. Specificity for patients without polyps 5 mm or larger was 53%-60% at all dose levels and for patients without any polyps was 26% (at 100 and 50 mAs) and 48% (at 30 mAs). Image quality decreased significantly as the dose level decreased. The median effective doses (supine and prone positions) calculated from protocols reported in the literature and updates were 7.8 and 8.8 mSv, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although image quality decreases significantly at 30 mAs (3.6 mSv), polyp detection remains unimpaired. The median dose for CT colonography at institutions that perform CT colonographic research is currently 8.8 mSv.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091658     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

2.  Review of a simple noise simulation technique in digital radiography.

Authors:  Rie Tanaka; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Kosuke Matsubara; Hiroki Kawashima
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control?

Authors:  Hyun Kyong Lim; Kyoung Ho Lee; So Yeon Kim; Kil Joong Kim; Bohyoung Kim; Hyunna Lee; Seong Ho Park; Jeffrey H Yanof; Seung-Sik Hwang; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

6.  Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity.

Authors:  W M Ajaj; T C Lauenstein; G Pelster; G Gerken; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin; S C Goehde
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Current status of CT colonography.

Authors:  Suzanne M Frentz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  Adrian Spreng; Peter Netzer; Joerg Mattich; Hans-Peter Dinkel; Peter Vock; Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT colonography in cancer detection: methods and results.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Thomas Mang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Tamaki Ichikawa; Keisuke Dasai; Katsuyuki Moriya; Tamio Kushihashi; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.