OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible contribution of the second somatosensory (SII) area in the generation of the N60 somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). METHODS: In 7 epileptic patients and in 6 healthy subjects scalp SEPs were recorded by 19 electrodes placed according to the 10-20 system. All epileptic patients but one were also investigated using depth electrodes chronically implanted in the parieto-rolandic opercular cortex. Scalp SEPs underwent brain electrical source analysis. RESULTS: In both epileptic patients and healthy subjects, scalp recordings showed two middle-latency components clearly distinguishable on the basis of latency and scalp distribution: a fronto-central N60 potential contralateral to stimulation and a later bilateral temporal N70 response. SEP dipolar source modelling showed that a contralateral perisylvian dipole was activated in the scalp N70 latency range whereas separate perirolandic and frontal sources were activated at the scalp N60 latency. Depth electrodes recorded a biphasic N60/P90 response in the parieto-rolandic opercular regions contra- and ipsilateral to stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Two different middle-latency SEP components N60 and N70 can be distinguished by topographic analysis and source modelling of scalp recordings, the sources of which are located in the fronto-central cortex contralateral to stimulation and in the supra-sylvian cortex on both sides, respectively. The source location of the scalp N70 in the SII area is strongly supported by its spatio-temporal similarities with SEPs directly recorded in the supra-sylvian opercular cortex.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible contribution of the second somatosensory (SII) area in the generation of the N60 somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). METHODS: In 7 epilepticpatients and in 6 healthy subjects scalp SEPs were recorded by 19 electrodes placed according to the 10-20 system. All epilepticpatients but one were also investigated using depth electrodes chronically implanted in the parieto-rolandic opercular cortex. Scalp SEPs underwent brain electrical source analysis. RESULTS: In both epilepticpatients and healthy subjects, scalp recordings showed two middle-latency components clearly distinguishable on the basis of latency and scalp distribution: a fronto-central N60 potential contralateral to stimulation and a later bilateral temporal N70 response. SEP dipolar source modelling showed that a contralateral perisylvian dipole was activated in the scalp N70 latency range whereas separate perirolandic and frontal sources were activated at the scalp N60 latency. Depth electrodes recorded a biphasic N60/P90 response in the parieto-rolandic opercular regions contra- and ipsilateral to stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Two different middle-latency SEP components N60 and N70 can be distinguished by topographic analysis and source modelling of scalp recordings, the sources of which are located in the fronto-central cortex contralateral to stimulation and in the supra-sylvian cortex on both sides, respectively. The source location of the scalp N70 in the SII area is strongly supported by its spatio-temporal similarities with SEPs directly recorded in the supra-sylvian opercular cortex.
Authors: Paolo Zanatta; Federico Linassi; Anna Paola Mazzarolo; Maria Aricò; Enrico Bosco; Matteo Bendini; Carlo Sorbara; Carlo Ori; Michele Carron; Bruno Scarpa Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 9.097