Literature DB >> 12088234

Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods.

H Christopher Frey1, Sumeet R Patil.   

Abstract

Identification and qualitative comparison of sensitivity analysis methods that have been used across various disciplines, and that merit consideration for application to food-safety risk assessment models, are presented in this article. Sensitivity analysis can help in identifying critical control points, prioritizing additional data collection or research, and verifying and validating a model. Ten sensitivity analysis methods, including four mathematical methods, five statistical methods, and one graphical method, are identified. The selected methods are compared on the basis of their applicability to different types of models, computational issues such as initial data requirement and complexity of their application, representation of the sensitivity, and the specific uses of these methods. Applications of these methods are illustrated with examples from various fields. No one method is clearly best for food-safety risk models. In general, use of two or more methods, preferably with dissimilar theoretical foundations, may be needed to increase confidence in the ranking of key inputs.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  37 in total

1.  Assessment of interindividual and geographic variability in human exposure to fine particulate matter in environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Ye Cao; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Improving efficiency of uncertainty analysis in complex integrated assessment models: the case of the RAINS emission module.

Authors:  Silke Gabbert
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Probabilistic exposure analysis for chemical risk characterization.

Authors:  Kenneth T Bogen; Alison C Cullen; H Christopher Frey; Paul S Price
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Mathematical modeling of the methionine cycle and transsulfuration pathway in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Troy Vargason; Daniel P Howsmon; Stepan Melnyk; S Jill James; Juergen Hahn
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Spatiotemporal sensitivity analysis of vertical transport of pesticides in soil.

Authors:  Tao Hong; S Thomas Purucker
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 5.288

6.  MODELING OF HUMAN EXPOSURE TO IN-VEHICLE PM(2.5) FROM ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE.

Authors:  Ye Cao; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Geographic differences in inter-individual variability of human exposure to fine particulate matter.

Authors:  Ye Cao; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Systematic calibration of a cell signaling network model.

Authors:  Kyoung Ae Kim; Sabrina L Spencer; John G Albeck; John M Burke; Peter K Sorger; Suzanne Gaudet; Do Hyun Kim
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Multiscale Model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Maps Metabolite and Gene Perturbations to Granuloma Sterilization Predictions.

Authors:  Elsje Pienaar; William M Matern; Jennifer J Linderman; Joel S Bader; Denise E Kirschner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 10.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.