Literature DB >> 12087236

Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience.

Albert Losken1, Grant W Carlson, John Bostwick, Glyn E Jones, John H Culbertson, Mark Schoemann.   

Abstract

Recent trends in breast reconstruction have transitioned toward the skin-sparing type of mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. This study was designed to document trends in the management of patients with unilateral breast cancer and to determine how they influence management of the contralateral breast. All patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospitals from January of 1975 to December of 1999 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified by timing of reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), method of reconstruction, and mastectomy type (skin-sparing versus non-skin-sparing). The methods of reconstruction included implant, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry included augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and reduction. A total of 1394 patients were evaluated, including 689 delayed and 705 immediate reconstructions. Sixty-seven percent of delayed-reconstruction patients (462 of 689) had a symmetry procedure performed on the opposite breast, compared with 22 percent for the immediate-reconstruction patients (155 of 705) (p </= 0.001). The percentage of times a contralateral procedure was performed was highest for implant reconstructions (89 percent delayed and 57 percent immediate) and lowest for TRAM flap reconstructions (59 percent delayed and 18 percent immediate). Augmentation mammaplasty was the most common symmetry procedure for implant reconstruction (41 percent), whereas reduction was the most common procedure for autologous tissue reconstruction (57 percent). Immediate unilateral breast reconstructions were stratified into non-skin-sparing mastectomy (n = 205) and skin-sparing mastectomy (n = 500). Thirty-four percent of patients with a non-skin-sparing mastectomy defect (70 of 205) underwent a contralateral breast procedure, compared with 17 percent of patients with a skin-sparing mastectomy defect (85 of 500) (p = 0.001). The percentage of times a contralateral procedure was performed in immediate reconstruction, stratified by mastectomy and reconstruction type, was only significant for TRAM flap reconstructions (25 versus 11 percent). Trends in the management of unilateral breast cancer from delayed to immediate reconstruction and from implants to autologous tissue have reduced the incidence of contralateral symmetry procedures. Reduction mammaplasty is the most common symmetry procedure used for autologous tissue reconstruction, with augmentation predominating when implants are used. The type of mastectomy also effects the management of the opposite breast, with skin-sparing mastectomy further reducing the incidence of contralateral procedures in immediate TRAM flap reconstruction, compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12087236     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  TRAM Revisions and Contralateral Mammaplasties: The Role of "Mirror Image" Skin Patterns.

Authors:  Richard J Restifo
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Essential elements of the preoperative breast reconstruction evaluation.

Authors:  Angela Cheng; Albert Losken
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades.

Authors:  Ilana G Margulies; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 4.  Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

5.  Barriers to breast reconstruction after mastectomy in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  G Philip Barnsley; Leif Sigurdson; Susan Kirkland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer: trends, predictors, and areas for future research.

Authors:  Michaela S Tracy; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Laura Dominici; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Tabbed tissue expanders improve breast symmetry scores in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Madeleine J Gust; David W Grant; Khang T Nguyen; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-13

8.  Feasibility of Implementing a Breast Reconstruction Database.

Authors:  Connor R McGuire; Laura Allen; Martin R LeBlanc
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations.

Authors:  Mark L Smith; Emily M Clarke-Pearson; Michael Vornovitsky; Joseph H Dayan; William Samson; Mark R Sultan
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

10.  Innovative combination of therapeutic mammoplasty and expandable-implant breast augmentation for immediate partial breast reconstruction.

Authors:  A M H Choo; P Forouhi; C M Malata
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.