Literature DB >> 12084681

Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute.

Leonard H Glantz1.   

Abstract

Research with young children raises difficult issues of law and ethics. A recent Maryland case, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc, appears to impose restrictive rules on research with children when the subjects are put at risk but cannot derive direct benefit from their involvement in the research project. This case exemplifies the tension that exists between the goal of science to increase knowledge and the protection of the rights and welfare of nonconsenting research subjects. While some language in the opinion may be difficult to understand or apply, for the most part the case reflects the problems other courts and ethicists have had in delineating the role of children in "nontherapeutic" research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12084681      PMCID: PMC1447190          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  3 in total

1.  Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.

Authors:  George J Annas
Journal:  J Contemp Health Law Policy       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Research with children.

Authors:  L H Glantz
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1998

3.  In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.

Authors:  B Freedman; A Fuks; C Weijer
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Ethics in public health institutions.

Authors:  Richard P Wedeen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions.

Authors:  David R Buchanan; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Stakeholder Opinions And Ethical Perspectives Support Complete Disclosure Of Incidental Findings In MRI Research.

Authors:  John P Phillips; Caitlin Cole; John P Gluck; Jody M Shoemaker; Linda Petree; Deborah Helitzer; Ronald Schrader; Mark Holdsworth
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014-10-20

4.  Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.

Authors:  M Spriggs
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Two Novel Urban Health Primary Care Residency Tracks That Focus On Community-Level Structural Vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Benjamin J Oldfield; Bennett W Clark; Monica C Mix; Katherine C Shaw; Janet R Serwint; Sanjay V Desai; Rachel M Kruzan; Rosalyn W Stewart; Sebastian Ruhs; Leonard S Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  An exploration of ethical issues in research in children's health and the environment.

Authors:  Jerome A Paulson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.