Literature DB >> 12081430

Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: an MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density.

Liina Pylkkänen1, Andrew Stringfellow, Alec Marantz.   

Abstract

Evidence from electrophysiological measures such as ERPs (event-related potentials) and MEG (magnetoencephalography) suggest that the first evoked brain response component sensitive to stimulus properties affecting reaction times in word recognition tasks occurs at 300-400 ms. The present study used the stimulus manipulation of Vitevich and Luce (1999) to investigate whether the M350, an MEG response component peaking at 300-400 ms, reflects lexical or postlexical processing. Stimuli were simultaneously varied in phonotactic probability, which facilitates lexical activation, and in phonological neighborhood density, which inhibits the lexical decision process. The present results indicate that the M350 shows facilitation by phonotactic probability rather than inhibition by neighborhood density. Thus the M350 cannot be a postlexical component. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081430     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  36 in total

1.  The time and space of lexicality: a neuromagnetic view.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Patricia J Pardo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cortical dynamics of word recognition.

Authors:  Nelly Mainy; Julien Jung; Monica Baciu; Philippe Kahane; Benjamin Schoendorff; Lorella Minotti; Dominique Hoffmann; Olivier Bertrand; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers.

Authors:  Qingqing Qu; Markus F Damian; Nina Kazanina
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?

Authors:  Michael Wolmetz; David Poeppel; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Philip J Monahan; Robert Fiorentino; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Spectro-temporal correlates of lexical access during auditory lexical decision.

Authors:  Jonathan Brennan; Constantine Lignos; David Embick; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: a Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data.

Authors:  David W Gow; Corey J Keller; Emad Eskandar; Nate Meng; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.