Literature DB >> 12081378

Graded aspects of morphological processing: task and processing time.

Laurie Beth Feldman1, Brendon Prostko.   

Abstract

Effects on targets of orthographically (O) and semantically (S) related primes were compared with morphologically related (M) primes in the lexical decision, naming, and go/no go naming tasks. The overall pattern typified the graded nature of morphological processing. Morphological relatedness produced facilitation whose magnitude varied across a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs of 66-300 ms) and tasks. The effect of semantic and orthographic similarity also depended on SOA and on task. Importantly, the effects of morphological relatedness and orthographic similarity diverged along a time course that reflected semantic processing but could only be approximated by the effect of semantic relatedness between prime and target.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12081378      PMCID: PMC2896719          DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  18 in total

1.  Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position.

Authors:  L B Feldman; E G Soltano
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Does phonological change play a role in the recognition of derived forms across modalities?

Authors:  K Tsapkini; E Kehayia; G Jarema
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation.

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Does prime modality influence morphological processing?

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing.

Authors:  Michal Raveh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: evidence from masked non-word priming.

Authors:  L Ferrand; J Grainger
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-10

7.  Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.

Authors:  E Drews; P Zwitserlood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  A Deutsch; R Frost; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

Authors:  R Frost; K I Forster; A Deutsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon.

Authors:  K Kirsner; D Milech; P Standen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words: Conjoint effects of form and meaning in word recognition.

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2009-11-01

2.  Rules versus statistics: insights from a highly inflected language.

Authors:  Jelena Mirković; Mark S Seidenberg; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun

3.  Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.

Authors:  Eva Smolka; Matthias Gondan; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Native speakers like affixes, L2 speakers like letters? An overt visual priming study investigating the role of orthography in L2 morphological processing.

Authors:  Laura Anna Ciaccio; Gunnar Jacob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.