Literature DB >> 21564267

Rules versus statistics: insights from a highly inflected language.

Jelena Mirković1, Mark S Seidenberg, Marc F Joanisse.   

Abstract

Inflectional morphology has been taken as a paradigmatic example of rule-governed grammatical knowledge (Pinker, 1999). The plausibility of this claim may be related to the fact that it is mainly based on studies of English, which has a very simple inflectional system. We examined the representation of inflectional morphology in Serbian, which encodes number, gender, and case for nouns. Linguists standardly characterize this system as a complex set of rules, with disagreements about their exact form. We present analyses of a large corpus of nouns which showed that, as in English, Serbian inflectional morphology is quasiregular: It exhibits numerous partial regularities creating neighborhoods that vary in size and consistency. We then asked whether a simple connectionist network could encode this statistical information in a manner that also supported generalization. A network trained on 3,244 Serbian nouns learned to produce correctly inflected phonological forms from a specification of a word's lemma, gender, number, and case, and generalized to untrained cases. The model's performance was sensitive to variables that also influence human performance, including surface and lemma frequency. It was also influenced by inflectional neighborhood size, a novel measure of the consistency of meaning to form mapping. A word-naming experiment with native Serbian speakers showed that this measure also affects human performance. The results suggest that, as in English, generating correctly inflected forms involves satisfying a small number of simultaneous probabilistic constraints relating form and meaning. Thus, common computational mechanisms may govern the representation and use of inflectional information across typologically diverse languages.
Copyright © 2011 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564267      PMCID: PMC3095521          DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  36 in total

1.  The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network.

Authors:  J G Rueckl; M Raveh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model.

Authors:  M F Joanisse; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form?

Authors:  L B Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns.

Authors:  Laura Barca; Cristina Burani; Lisa S Arduino
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2002-08

6.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study.

Authors:  Adam Albright; Bruce Hayes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-12

7.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Rules of language.

Authors:  S Pinker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Simulating Language-specific and Language-general Effects in a Statistical Learning Model of Chinese Reading.

Authors:  Jianfeng Yang; Bruce D McCandliss; Hua Shu; Jason D Zevin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Linearity and Structural Complexity Interact and Affect the Recognition of Italian Derived Words.

Authors:  Franca Ferrari Bridgers; Natalie Kacinik
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-02

2.  When Singular and Plural are Both Grammatical: Semantic and Morphophonological Effects in Agreement.

Authors:  Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The Science of Reading and Its Educational Implications.

Authors:  Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013

4.  Linking Adult Second Language Learning and Diachronic Change: A Cautionary Note.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; Patricia J Brooks
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.