Literature DB >> 12080313

Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion.

Shannon Owens1, Peter H Buschang, Gaylord S Throckmorton, Leslea Palmer, Jeryl English.   

Abstract

This preliminary study evaluated relationships between masticatory performance and areas of interocclusal distance contact (<50 microm) and near contact (50-350 microm) of the buccal segments during maximum intercuspation. The sample included subjects with normal occlusion (n = 18) and Class I (n = 14), Class II (n = 13), and Class III (n = 6) malocclusions. Chewing performance was evaluated on the basis of the breakdown of CutterSil (Heraeus Kulze, South Bend, Ind); chewing ability was assessed by the number of chews necessary to swallow jerky and almonds. Impressions of the buccal segments, taken with Blu Mousse (Parkell Bio-Materials, Farmingdale, NY) impression material, were scanned and enlarged, and each subject's first molars and premolars were manually traced bilaterally to estimate the platform area. The areas of contact and near contact (ACNC) that measured between 0 and 350 microm thick were estimated optically on the basis of the amount of light transmitted through the impression. The results showed no significant differences in platform area between the right and left sides or between the malocclusion groups. ACNC were negatively related to median particle size and broadness of particle distribution. There were no correlations between ACNC and the number of chews necessary to swallow jerky or almonds. Subjects with normal occlusion had significantly larger ACNC than those with Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions, in descending order. Subjects with Class III malocclusions had the smallest areas of near contact (<350 microm). We concluded that ACNC are similar on the right and left sides; that subjects with larger ACNC are better able to break down foods; and that subjects with malocclusions have smaller ACNC than those with normal occlusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12080313     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.122829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.

Authors:  R DeLong; S Knorr; G C Anderson; J Hodges; M R Pintado
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Malocclusion, mastication and the gastrointestinal system: a review.

Authors:  Peter Proff
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  An interview with Peter H. Buschang.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Ary dos Santos-Pinto; Eustáquio Araújo; Gerson Luiz Ulema Ribeiro; Helder Baldi Jacob; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014-12-01

4.  Orthopedic correction of growing hyperdivergent, retrognathic patients with miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Roberto Carrillo; P Emile Rossouw
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Changes in occlusal bite force following placement of preformed metal crowns on primary molars in 4-6 years old children: a 6 months' follow-up pilot study.

Authors:  A I Owais; A H Al-Battah; E S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  USE OF THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE (MCID) FOR EVALUATING TREATMENT OUTCOMES WITH TMJMD PATIENTS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY().

Authors:  Megan Ingram; Yun Hee Choi; Chung-Yi Chiu; Rob Haggard; Angela Liegey Dougall; Peter Buschang; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Appl Biobehav Res       Date:  2012-01-10

7.  Occlusal, chewing, and tasting characteristics associated with orofacial dysfunctions in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ana Bheatriz Marangoni Montes; Thais Marchini de Oliveira; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião; Taís de Souza Barbosa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Masticatory performance and chewing cycle kinematics-are they related?

Authors:  Casey Lepley; Gaylord Throckmorton; Sarah Parker; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bauer; Rolf Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. A systematic review.

Authors:  Isabela Brandão Magalhães; Luciano José Pereira; Leandro Silva Marques; Gustavo Hauber Gameiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.