Literature DB >> 12079137

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate.

Leena Khaitan1, Hugh Houston, Kenneth Sharp, Michael Holzman, William Richards.   

Abstract

Recent literature has reported as high as a 42 per cent recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR). We report long-term follow-up in a cohort of patients undergoing LPEHR at Vanderbilt University. Thirty-one patients underwent attempted LPEHR between September 1993 and May 2000. Six of 31 patients (19%) were converted to an open procedure and were excluded from the study. All patients had complete excision of the sac, primary closure of the crura, and an antireflux procedure. An Institutional Review Board-approved follow-up barium esophagram was performed at a mean of 25 months postoperatively. Three experienced laparoscopic surgeons (K.S., M.H., and W.R.) collectively reviewed the esophagrams for evidence of recurrence. The mean age of patients was 61 years (range 41-92). There were six males and 19 females. Fifteen of 25 patients (60%) returned for an esophagram. Only one of 15 patients (7%) had a recurrent paraesophageal hernia. However, five of 15 patients (33%) had herniated an intact wrap 2 to 4 cm above the diaphragm. The patient with a true paraesophageal hernia recurrence returned with symptoms of dysphagia. Two of the five patients (40%) with a herniated wrap complained of heartburn, which was controlled with a proton pump inhibitor. All other patients were asymptomatic. Our recurrence rate of true paraesophageal hernias after LPEHR is low (7%) and compares with that reported in the literature for open repairs. However, 33 per cent of the patients in this study were found to have a herniated wrap. Because there is no risk of strangulation we have not operated on any of these patients. LPEHR is our procedure of choice for Type II and III hiatal hernias with good symptom relief and a low true recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12079137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: impact on dyspnoea.

Authors:  Jacqui C Zhu; Guillermo Becerril; Katy Marasovic; Alvin J Ing; Gregory L Falk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; Nathaniel W Lytle; Juan P Toro; Jahnavi Srinivasan; Arvinpal Singh; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: are there factors associated with anatomic recurrence?

Authors:  Michael Antiporda; Benjamin Veenstra; Chloe Jackson; Pujan Kandel; C Daniel Smith; Steven P Bowers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Rebecca P Petersen; L Michael Brunt; Nathaniel J Soper; Brett C Sheppard; Lee Mitsumori; Charles Rohrmann; Lee L Swanstrom; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Primary versus redo paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of operative and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  H Reza Zahiri; Adam S Weltz; Udai S Sibia; Neethi Paranji; Steven D Leydorf; George T Fantry; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis.

Authors:  Allan Okrainec; Lorenzo E Ferri; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Is a circular polypropylene mesh appropriate for application at the esophageal hiatus? Results from an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Beat P Müller-Stich; Arianeb Mehrabi; Hannes G Kenngott; Hamidreza Fonouni; Michael A Reiter; Gani Kuttymoratov; Felix Nickel; Georg R Linke; Ivo Wolf; Jörg Köninger; Carsten N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Severe complication of laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Nico Zügel; Reinhold A Lang; Martin Kox; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Do recurrences after paraesophageal hernia repair matter? : Ten-year follow-up after laparoscopic repair.

Authors:  B C White; L O Jeansonne; C B Morgenthal; S Zagorski; S S Davis; C D Smith; E Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.