Literature DB >> 12077541

Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested patients.

L Kohl1, A Blondeel, M Song.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cosmetics have been used since the oldest known civilisations, and nowadays almost everybody resorts to beauty products.
OBJECTIVE: Considering the increasing incidence of contact dermatitis, the aim of the study is to determine the impact of allergy to cosmetics.
METHODS: From January 1998 to December 1999, 819 patients were subjected to epicutaneous tests for suspicion of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The results were analysed retrospectively in the total population and in that of children under 16: the interest has been focused on cosmetics.
RESULTS: 297 patients (36.3%) with ACD to 1 or more cosmetic ingredients have been detected. 34 (48.6%) out of 70 children patch tested showed an ACD: cosmetics represented the first cause.
CONCLUSION: For two decades, the incidence of ACD has been rising; two main reasons can be put forward: a rising product consumption and a more exhaustive allergen research in patch testing. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12077541     DOI: 10.1159/000063379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatology        ISSN: 1018-8665            Impact factor:   5.366


  9 in total

1.  An important difference between "exposed" and "photodistributed" underscores the importance of identifying common reactions.

Authors:  Sharon E Jacob; Andrew D Breithaupt
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-09

2.  Comparison of Marketed Cosmetic Products Constituents with the Antigens Included in Cosmetic-related Patch Test.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Cheong; You Won Choi; Ki Bum Myung; Hae Young Choi
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 3.  Patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis in the allergist office.

Authors:  Luz Fonacier; Ernest N Charlesworth
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Contact dermatitis: Clinical practice findings from a single tertiary referral hospital, a 4-Year retrospective study.

Authors:  Giovanni Sedó-Mejía; Andrés Soto-Rodríguez; Caridad Pino-García; Alfredo Sanabria-Castro; Olga Patricia Monge-Ortega
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 5.  Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany.

Authors:  M Peiser; T Tralau; J Heidler; A M Api; J H E Arts; D A Basketter; J English; T L Diepgen; R C Fuhlbrigge; A A Gaspari; J D Johansen; A T Karlberg; I Kimber; J P Lepoittevin; M Liebsch; H I Maibach; S F Martin; H F Merk; T Platzek; T Rustemeyer; A Schnuch; R J Vandebriel; I R White; A Luch
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Cosmetic contact sensitivity in patients with melasma: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Neel Prabha; Vikram K Mahajan; Karaninder S Mehta; Pushpinder S Chauhan; Mrinal Gupta
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2014-07-14

Review 7.  Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period.

Authors:  Dulcilea Ferraz Rodrigues; Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

8.  Patch test results in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in the Podlasie region.

Authors:  Teresa Reduta; Joanna Bacharewicz; Anna Pawłoś
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  Intricate Relationship Between Adaptive and Innate Immune System in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Muhammad Azeem; Hidaya Kader; Andreas Kerstan; Helal F Hetta; Edgar Serfling; Matthias Goebeler; Khalid Muhammad
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-12-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.