Literature DB >> 12074689

Pharmacokinetics of the carmustine implant.

Alison B Fleming1, W Mark Saltzman.   

Abstract

Controlled release delivery of carmustine from biodegradable polymer wafers was approved as an adjunct to surgical resection in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme after it was shown in clinical trials to be well tolerated and effective. Given the localised nature of the drug in the brain tissue, no direct pharmacokinetic measurements have been made in humans after implantation of a carmustine wafer. However, drug distribution and clearance have been extensively studied in both rodent and non-human primate brains at various times after implantation. In addition, studies to characterise the degradation of the polymer matrix, the release kinetics of carmustine and the metabolic fate of the drug and polymer degradation products have been conducted both in vitro and in vivo. GLIADEL wafers have been shown to release carmustine in vivo over a period of approximately 5 days; when in continuous contact with interstitial fluid, wafers should degrade completely over a period of 6 to 8 weeks. Metabolic elimination studies of the polymer degradation products have demonstrated that sebacic acid monomers are excreted from the body in the form of expired CO(2), whereas 1,3-bis-(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane monomers are excreted primarily through the urine. Carmustine degradation products are also excreted primarily through the urine. Pharmacokinetic studies in animals and associated modelling have demonstrated the capability of this modality to produce high dose-delivery (millimolar concentrations) within millimetres of the polymer implant, with a limited penetration distance of carmustine from the site of delivery. The limited spread of drug is presumably due to the high transcapillary permeability of this lipophilic molecule. However, the presence of significant convective flows due to postsurgical oedema may augment the diffusive transport of drug in the hours immediately after wafer implantation, leading to a larger short-term spread of drug. Additionally, in non-human primates, the presence of significant doses in more distant regions of the brain (centimetres away from the implant) has been shown to persist over the course of a week. The drug in this region was presumed to be transported from the implant site by either cerebral blood flow or cerebrospinal fluid flow, suggesting that although drug is able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier at the site of delivery, it may re-enter within the confines of the brain tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12074689     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  56 in total

Review 1.  Do anticancer agents reach the tumor target in the human brain?

Authors:  M G Donelli; M Zucchetti; M D'Incalci
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Drug "diffusion" within the brain.

Authors:  J Fenstermacher; T Kaye
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Interstitial chemotherapy with carmustine-loaded polymers for high-grade gliomas: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  S Valtonen; U Timonen; P Toivanen; H Kalimo; L Kivipelto; O Heiskanen; G Unsgaard; T Kuurne
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Morphological characterization of polyanhydride biodegradable implant gliadel during in vitro and in vivo erosion using scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  W Dang; T Daviau; H Brem
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Transport and elimination of recombinant human NGF during long-term delivery to the brain.

Authors:  C E Krewson; W M Saltzman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  New delivery systems for brain tumor therapy.

Authors:  E P Sipos; H Brem
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  Drug delivery to the brain using polymers.

Authors:  A Domb; M Maniar; S Bogdansky; M Chasin
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.889

8.  Biodegradable polymers for controlled delivery of chemotherapy with and without radiation therapy in the monkey brain.

Authors:  H Brem; R J Tamargo; A Olivi; M Pinn; J D Weingart; M Wharam; J I Epstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  In vivo versus in vitro degradation of controlled release polymers for intracranial surgical therapy.

Authors:  M P Wu; J A Tamada; H Brem; R Langer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1994-03

10.  Excretion of a radiolabelled anticancer biodegradable polymeric implant from the rabbit brain.

Authors:  A J Domb; M Rock; C Perkin; G Yipchuck; B Broxup; J G Villemure
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  87 in total

1.  Ultrasound-enhanced drug transport and distribution in the brain.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Sumit Paliwal; Krystof S Bankiewicz; John R Bringas; Gill Heart; Samir Mitragotri; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Novel delivery strategies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jiangbing Zhou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Benjamin T Himes; Garth W Strohbehn; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 3.  Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Owen S Fenton; Katy N Olafson; Padmini S Pillai; Michael J Mitchell; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Temporal changes in magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of Gliadel wafers and of the adjacent brain parenchyma.

Authors:  Stephan Ulmer; Klara Spalek; Arya Nabavi; Susan Schultka; H Maximillian Mehdorn; Santosh Kesari; Lutz Dörner
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  BCNU/PLGA microspheres: a promising strategy for the treatment of gliomas in mice.

Authors:  Tongming Zhu; Yiwen Shen; Qisheng Tang; Luping Chen; Huasong Gao; Jianhong Zhu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Mathematical Modelling of Convection Enhanced Delivery of Carmustine and Paclitaxel for Brain Tumour Therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Zhan; Davis Yohanes Arifin; Timothy Ky Lee; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Evaluation of serial changes on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after implantation of carmustine wafers in patients with malignant gliomas for differential diagnosis of tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Shiro Ohue; Shohei Kohno; Akihiro Inoue; Daisuke Yamashita; Satoshi Suehiro; Toshimoto Seno; Yoshiaki Kumon; Keiichi Kikuchi; Takanori Ohnishi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  PEGylated squalenoyl-gemcitabine nanoparticles for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alice Gaudin; Eric Song; Amanda R King; Jennifer K Saucier-Sawyer; Ranjit Bindra; Didier Desmaële; Patrick Couvreur; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Controlled release for local delivery of drugs: barriers and models.

Authors:  Jennifer R Weiser; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 10.  The combination of carmustine wafers and temozolomide for the treatment of malignant gliomas. A comprehensive review of the rationale and clinical experience.

Authors:  A Gutenberg; C B Lumenta; W E K Braunsdorf; M Sabel; H M Mehdorn; M Westphal; A Giese
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.