Literature DB >> 12074379

AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: survey and status report.

A M Richardt1, R Benigni.   

Abstract

A wide variety of artificial intelligence (AI) and structure-activity relationship (SAR) approaches have been applied to tackling the general problem of predicting rodent chemical carcinogenicity. Given the diversity of chemical structures and mechanisms relative to this endpoint, the shared challenge of these approaches is to accurately delineate classes of active chemicals representing distinct biological and chemical mechanism domains, and within those classes determine the structural features and properties responsible for modulating activity. In the following discussion, we present a survey of AI and SAR approaches that have been applied to the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity, and discuss these in general terms and in the context of the results of two organized prediction exercises (PTE-1 and PTE-2) sponsored by the US National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program. Most models participating in these exercises were successful in identifying major structural-alerting classes of active carcinogens, but failed in modeling the more subtle modifiers to activity within those classes. In addition, methods that incorporated mechanism-based reasoning or biological data along with structural information outperformed models limited to structural information exclusively. Finally, a few recent carcinogenicity-modeling efforts are presented illustrating progress in tackling some aspects of the carcinogenicity prediction problem. The first example, a QSAR model for predicting carcinogenic potency of aromatic amines, illustrates that success is possible within well-represented classes of carcinogens. From the second example, a newly developed FDA/OTR MultiCASE model for predicting the carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals, we conclude that the definitions of biological activity and nature of chemicals in the training set are important determinants of the predictive success and specificity/sensitivity characteristics of a derived model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12074379     DOI: 10.1080/10629360290002055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  8 in total

1.  A radial-distribution-function approach for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Aliuska Helguera Morales; Miguel Angel Cabrera Pérez; Maykel Pérez González
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjan Vračko; Marjan Tušar; Aneta Jezierska; Marjana Novič; Ralph Kühne; Gerrit Schüürmann
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjan Vracko; Marjana Novic; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Todd M Martin; Lin Ye; Alexander Sedykh; Douglas M Young; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  In silico prediction of drug toxicity.

Authors:  John C Dearden
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Facilitating compound progression of antiretroviral agents via modeling and simulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity using QSAR methods: a case study of sulfur mustard and its breakdown products.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz; Gino Begluitti; Terry Tincher; John Wheeler; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.