Steven James Linton1. 1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Orebro University Hospital, Sweden. steven.linton@orebroll.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large number of people suffer from upper extremity disorders, but a few apparently consume the majority of the resources. Early interventions are badly needed to prevent the development of persistent disability. Since psychological factors are central in the development of a chronic problem these might be utilized in this endeavor. METHODS: A series of studies are described where a screening procedure based on psychological risk factors was employed to help identify people at risk for developing long-term work disability. The utility of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention that focuses on coping strategies as prevention was assessed in three randomized-controlled studies where participants had low, medium, and high risk, respectively. RESULTS: The study with low risk showed no significant difference between the groups, while the studies with medium- and high-risk populations demonstrated significantly lower work disability than control groups receiving treatment as usual. CONCLUSIONS: It appears to be feasible to identify patients with high levels of risk and to subsequently lower the risk for work disability by administering a cognitive-behavioral intervention focusing on psychological aspects of the pain problem.
BACKGROUND: A large number of people suffer from upper extremity disorders, but a few apparently consume the majority of the resources. Early interventions are badly needed to prevent the development of persistent disability. Since psychological factors are central in the development of a chronic problem these might be utilized in this endeavor. METHODS: A series of studies are described where a screening procedure based on psychological risk factors was employed to help identify people at risk for developing long-term work disability. The utility of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention that focuses on coping strategies as prevention was assessed in three randomized-controlled studies where participants had low, medium, and high risk, respectively. RESULTS: The study with low risk showed no significant difference between the groups, while the studies with medium- and high-risk populations demonstrated significantly lower work disability than control groups receiving treatment as usual. CONCLUSIONS: It appears to be feasible to identify patients with high levels of risk and to subsequently lower the risk for work disability by administering a cognitive-behavioral intervention focusing on psychological aspects of the pain problem.
Authors: Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Ton Kuijpers; Petra Jellema; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Lex M Bouter Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eva Skillgate; Eva Vingård; Malin Josephson; Töres Theorell; Lars Alfredsson Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Petra Jellema; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Wim A B Stalman; Lex M Bouter Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.386