Literature DB >> 12070727

Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures.

G J Kemerink1, M J Frantzen, K Oei, M Sluzewski, W J van Rooij, J Wilmink, J M A van Engelshoven.   

Abstract

Neurointerventional procedures can involve very high doses of radiation to the patient. Our purpose was to quantify the exposure of patients and workers during such procedures, and to use the data for optimisation. We monitored the coiling of 27 aneurysms, and embolisation of four arteriovenous malformations. We measured entrance doses at the skull of the patient using thermoluminescent dosemeters. An observer logged the dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and characteristics of the digital angiographic and fluoroscopic projections. We also measured entrance doses to the workers at the glabella, neck, arms, hands and legs. The highest patient entrance dose was 2.3 Gy, the average maximum entrance dose 0.9+/-0.5 Gy. The effective dose to the patient was estimated as 14.0+/-8.1 mSv. Other average values were: DAP 228+/-131 Gy cm(2), fluoroscopy time 34.8+/-12.6 min, number of angiographic series 19.3+/-9.4 and number of frames 267+/-143. The highest operator entrance dose was observed on the left leg (235+/-174 microGy). The effective dose to the operator, wearing a 0.35 mm lead equivalent apron, was 6.7+/-4.6 microSv. Thus, even the highest patient entrance dose was in the lower part of the range in which nonstochastic effects might arise. Nevertheless, we are trying to reduce patient exposure by optimising machine settings and clinical protocols, and by informing the operator when the total DAP reaches a defined threshold. The contribution of neurointerventional procedures to occupational dose was very small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12070727     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-002-0780-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  17 in total

Review 1.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Monitoring neurointerventional radiation doses using dose-tracking software: implications for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  Holly Acton; Karl James; Richard G Kavanagh; Colm O'Tuathaigh; Deirdre Moloney; Gerald Wyse; Noel Fanning; Michael Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Minimizing dose during fluoroscopic tracking through geometric performance feedback.

Authors:  S Siddique; E Fiume; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Iso-uncertainty control in an experimental fluoroscopy system.

Authors:  S Siddique; E Fiume; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Accuracy of flat panel detector CT with integrated navigational software with and without MR fusion for single-pass needle placement.

Authors:  Marc C Mabray; Sanjit Datta; Prasheel V Lillaney; Teri Moore; Sonja Gehrisch; Jason F Talbott; Michael R Levitt; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Paul S Larson; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Cumulative radiation dose in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study using a self-developing film badge.

Authors:  A C Mamourian; H Young; M F Stiefel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  A new method of real-time skin dose visualization. Clinical evaluation of fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Fazel Boujan; Nicolas Clauss; Emilie Santos; Sjirk Boon; Gerard Schouten; Luc Mertz; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Brain AVM embolization with Onyx.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; M Sluzewski; G N Beute
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Patient skin dose during neuroembolization by multiple-point measurement using a radiosensitive indicator.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; Y Matsumaru; S Nobuyuki; M Ebara; T Abe; D Itoh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.