Literature DB >> 12070016

Engraftment potential of human fetal hematopoietic cells in NOD/SCID mice is not restricted to mitotically quiescent cells.

Jannine Wilpshaar1, Mickie Bhatia, Humphrey H H Kanhai, Robert Breese, Doug K Heilman, Cynthia S Johnson, J H Frederik Falkenburg, Edward F Srour.   

Abstract

During fetal development, there is a continued demand for large numbers of primitive and mature hematopoietic cells. This demand may require that all potential hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) migrate effectively to emerging hematopoietic sites and subsequently contribute to blood cell production, regardless of their cell cycle status. We recently established that umbilical cord blood cells in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle have a repopulating potential similar to cells in G(0), suggesting that cycling prenatal and neonatal HSCs may have the same functional capabilities described for quiescent, but not cycling, cells from adult sources. To establish the relationship between cell cycle status and hematopoietic potential at early stages of human ontogeny, the in vivo engraftment potential of mitotically defined fetal liver (FL) and fetal bone marrow (FBM) cells were examined in NOD/SCID recipients. Following transplantation of the same numbers of G(0), G(1), or S/G(2)+M CD34(+) cells from FL, equivalent percentages of recipient mice were chimeric (55%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). FBM-derived CD34(+) cells in all phases of the cell cycle engrafted in conditioned recipients and sustained human hematopoiesis, albeit at lower levels than their FL-derived counterparts. Multilineage differentiation was evident in all transplanted mice independent of the source or cell cycle status of graft cells. In addition, levels of chimerism in mice transplanted with fetal blood-derived G(0) or G(1) CD34(+) lineage-depleted cells were similar. These results support the assertion that mitotically quiescent and cycling fetal hematopoietic cells contain marrow-repopulating stem cells capable of multilineage engraftment in NOD/SCID mouse recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12070016     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v100.1.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  5 in total

1.  Children are not little adults: just ask their hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  David A Williams; Haiming Xu; Jose A Cancelas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Genetic modification of human hematopoietic cells: preclinical optimization of oncoretroviral-mediated gene transfer for clinical trials.

Authors:  Tulin Budak-Alpdogan; Isabelle Rivière
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

3.  Characterization of hematopoietic stem cells from the canine yolk sac.

Authors:  Bárbara Rossi de Sousa; Vanessa Cristina de Oliveira; Alessandra Oliveira Pinheiro; Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.807

4.  Genomic and proteomic analysis of the impact of mitotic quiescence on the engraftment of human CD34+ cells.

Authors:  Brahmananda Reddy Chitteti; Yunlong Liu; Edward F Srour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Regenerative response in ischemic brain restricted by p21cip1/waf1.

Authors:  Jianhua Qiu; Yasushi Takagi; Jun Harada; Neil Rodrigues; Michael A Moskowitz; David T Scadden; Tao Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 14.307

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.