Literature DB >> 12069214

The search for value in health care: a review of the National Committee for Quality Assurance efforts.

Andrea Ohldin1, Adrienne Mims.   

Abstract

Large employers formed the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) to ensure value to healthcare purchasers. Value in healthcare is a function of quality divided by costs. Through NCQA's role as an accrediting agency for healthcare organizations and the development of performance measures, Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS), gains toward defining the value of health services have materialized. An analysis of the impact of HEDIS data collection on physician practices and the influence of HEDIS data on employer, employee, and governmental health plan selections is examined. This study consisted of a general review, from 1993 to 2001, of HealthStar databases, PubMed databases, and the NCQA website. NCQA accreditation is accepted as an important industry milestone for health plans, credentials verification organizations, and physician organizations. The data for HEDIS is collected from health plan administrative data repositories, whereas health plan members' clinical data may be collected by chart abstraction in physician offices. Data collection in physician offices consumes administrative resources from physician practices and health plans. As commercial and governmental insurers move toward greater adoption of HEDIS measures, complex implications are created for physician practices and vulnerable populations. There are lingering questions regarding the improvements in quality of care for medically underserved populations and physician practice costs attributable to HEDIS.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12069214      PMCID: PMC2594356     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  9 in total

1.  Accreditation. Why employers don't demand it.

Authors:  D Anderson
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Medical group practice applications for HEDIS: reality or myth?

Authors:  R R Girouard
Journal:  Coll Rev       Date:  1997

3.  Assessing managed care for children with chronic conditions.

Authors:  K Kuhlthau; D K Walker; J M Perrin; L Bauman; S L Gortmaker; P W Newacheck; R E Stein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards.

Authors:  A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Use of outcome data by purchasers and consumers: new strategies and new dilemmas.

Authors:  J H Hibbard
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group.

Authors:  R O Darouiche; I I Raad; S O Heard; J I Thornby; O C Wenker; A Gabrielli; J Berg; N Khardori; H Hanna; R Hachem; R L Harris; G Mayhall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Blue skies or black eyes? HEDIS puts not-for-profit plans on top.

Authors:  J Greene
Journal:  Hosp Health Netw       Date:  1998-04-20

Review 8.  Negotiating the new health system: purchasing publicly accountable managed care.

Authors:  S Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  HEDIS, what is it? What does it mean to me? How does it affect my practice?

Authors:  R Treadwell; J Treadwell
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  1995-07
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  The changing face of chronic illness management in primary care: a qualitative study of underlying influences and unintended outcomes.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Meta Kreiner; Howard Brody
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Dorine J van Staalduinen; Petra van den Bekerom; Sandra Groeneveld; Martha Kidanemariam; Anne M Stiggelbout; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A method for measuring the effect of certified electronic health record technology on childhood immunization status scores among Medicaid managed care network providers.

Authors:  Paul J Messino; Hadi Kharrazi; Julia M Kim; Harold Lehmann
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 6.317

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.