Literature DB >> 12064876

The molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis.

Pierre J Bouletreau1, Stephen M Warren, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis has become a mainstay in bone tissue engineering and has significantly improved our armamentarium for reconstructive craniomaxillofacial procedures. However, although the biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural changes associated with distraction osteogenesis have been widely described, the molecular mechanisms governing the formation of new bone in the interfragmental gap of gradually distracted bone segments remain largely unclear. Recently, a rat model of mandibular distraction was described that provides an excellent environment for deciphering the molecular mechanisms that mediate distraction osteogenesis. This article presents the hypotheses and current research that have furthered knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that govern distraction osteogenesis. Recent studies have implicated a growing number of cytokines that are intimately involved in the regulation of bone synthesis and turnover. The gene regulation of numerous cytokines (transforming growth factor-beta1, -beta2, -beta3, bone morphogenetic proteins, insulin-like growth factor-1, fibroblast growth factor-2) and extracellular matrix proteins (osteonectin, osteopontin) during distraction osteogenesis have been best characterized and are discussed in this article. It is believed that understanding the biomolecular mechanisms that mediate membranous distraction osteogenesis may guide the development of targeted strategies designed to improve distraction osteogenesis and accelerate bone healing. Copyright 2002 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12064876     DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Stem cell therapy remediates reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sagar S Deshpande; Kathleen K Gallagher; Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Deniz Sarhaddi; Hongli Sun; Paul H Krebsbach; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Transgenic Expression of Osteoactivin/gpnmb Enhances Bone Formation In Vivo and Osteoprogenitor Differentiation Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Nagat Frara; Samir M Abdelmagid; Gregory R Sondag; Fouad M Moussa; Vanessa R Yingling; Thomas A Owen; Steven N Popoff; Mary F Barbe; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  The many facets of PPARgamma: novel insights for the skeleton.

Authors:  Masanobu Kawai; Kyle M Sousa; Ormond A MacDougald; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Controlled induction of distributed microdeformation in wounded tissue via a microchamber array dressing.

Authors:  Bartholomew J Kane; George Younan; Douglas Helm; Pouya Dastouri; Harrison Prentice-Mott; Daniel Irimia; Rodney K Chan; Mehmet Toner; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Stress fracture healing: fatigue loading of the rat ulna induces upregulation in expression of osteogenic and angiogenic genes that mimic the intramembranous portion of fracture repair.

Authors:  Gregory R Wohl; Dwight A Towler; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  The effect of altering the mechanical loading environment on the expression of bone regenerating molecules in cases of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mohammad M Alzahrani; Emad A Anam; Asim M Makhdom; Isabelle Villemure; Reggie Charles Hamdy
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.