Literature DB >> 12062600

Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate cancer-specific and overall survival after radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Anthony V D'Amico1, Aparna Keshaviah, Judith Manola, Kerri Cote, Marian Loffredo, Olga Iskrzytzky, Andrew A Renshaw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the percentage of positive prostate biopsies provides clinically relevant information to a previously established risk stratification system with respect to the end points of prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival after radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies to predict PCSS and overall survival for 381 men who underwent radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer during the prostate-specific antigen era.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range 0.8-13.3), the presence of < or =50% positive biopsies vs. >50% positive biopsies provided a clinically relevant stratification of the 7-year estimates of PCSS (100% vs. 57%, p = 0.004) in intermediate-risk patients. Moreover, all patients could be stratified into a minimal or high-risk cohort on the basis of the 10-year estimates of PCSS (100% vs. 55%, p <0.0001) and overall survival (87% vs. 40%, p = 0.02) by incorporating the percentage of positive prostate biopsy information into a previously established risk stratification system.
CONCLUSION: The clinically relevant stratification of PCSS using the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in intermediate-risk patients confirms previous findings based on prostate-specific antigen outcome. These data provide evidence to support the ability to stratify newly diagnosed patients with clinically localized disease into a minimal-risk (low-risk + low biopsy volume [< or =50%] intermediate-risk) or high-risk (high biopsy volume [>50%] intermediate-risk + high-risk) cohort for prostate cancer-specific death after conventional dose radiotherapy. Additional follow-up and independent validation are needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062600     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02797-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Prostate Cancer: An Oncologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Kent; Maha Ha Hussain
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  The impact of dose-escalated radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation for prostate cancer using 2 linked nomograms.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Niraj H Pahlajani; Brian L Egleston; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Age and Racial Differences among PSA-Detected (AJCC Stage T1cN0M0) Prostate Cancer in the U.S.: A Population-Based Study of 70,345 Men.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Edward M Messing; Lois B Travis; Ollivier Hyrien; Rui Chen; Michael T Milano; Yuhchyau Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The dog prostate cancer (DPC-1) model: a reliable tool for molecular imaging of prostate tumors and metastases.

Authors:  Simone Chevalier; Serge Moffett; Eric Turcotte; Murillo Luz; Lyne Chauvette; Vilma Derbekyan; Eleonora Scarlata; Fatima Zouanat; Armen G Aprikian; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Mutant Kras-induced upregulation of CD24 enhances prostate cancer stemness and bone metastasis.

Authors:  Ching-Chieh Weng; Pei-Ya Ding; Yu-Hsuan Liu; John R Hawse; Malayannan Subramaniam; Chia-Chen Wu; Yu-Chun Lin; Chiao-Yun Chen; Wen-Chun Hung; Kuang-Hung Cheng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  The use of hormonal therapy with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of prospective randomised trials.

Authors:  A R Gottschalk; M Roach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.