Literature DB >> 12061737

Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Hans Roehrig.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The faceplate of a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display monitor is covered on the vacuum side with a phosphor screen. The different phosphors that can be used for this screen have distinctly different physical properties that can affect the noise properties of the display. Differences in noise affect the signal-to-noise ratio and, hence, may affect diagnostic performance. This study evaluated observer performance and visual search parameters in the detection of pulmonary nodules, comparing two monochrome CRT monitors with different phosphors (P45 and P104) and a color CRT monitor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The receiver operating characteristic paradigm was used to evaluate observer performance with a series of radiographic chest images containing solitary pulmonary nodules. Eye position was recorded as the observers searched the images on each type of monitor.
RESULTS: Observer performance, as indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared by means of an analysis of variance test, was best for the P45 monitor, next best for the P104 monitor, and worst for the color monitor. All differences were statistically significant. Eye-position parameters were also affected by monitor type. The time required to fixate the lesion and overall search times were longest with the color monitor.
CONCLUSION: The type of phosphor used in the CRT monitor faceplate can affect diagnostic performance and visual search parameters. Care should be taken in the selection of monitors for use in clinical radiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061737     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80308-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Eye-tracking analysis of skilled performance in clinical extracorporeal circulation.

Authors:  Yasuko Tomizawa; Hirotaka Aoki; Satoshi Suzuki; Toru Matayoshi; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  An Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Primary Display Devices.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Solution for nonuniformities and spatial noise in medical LCD displays by using pixel-based correction.

Authors:  Tom Kimpe; Albert Xthona; Paul Matthijs; Lode De Paepe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Understanding visual search patterns of dermatologists assessing pigmented skin lesions before and after online training.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Joseph Chao; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Lynne Morrison; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 7.  Human Factors and Human-Computer Considerations in Teleradiology and Telepathology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.