Literature DB >> 12061634

The serologic response to Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected chickens, followed by an indirect lipopolysaccharide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and bacteriologic examinations through a one-year period.

M N Skov1, N C Feld, B Carstensen, M Madsen.   

Abstract

Three groups of 100 individually marked salmonella-free chickens were followed for a period of 53 wk. The chickens were infected as day olds by crop instillation of 10(8) colony-forming units: one group with Salmonella enteritidis and a second group with Salmonella typhimurium. A third group was kept uninfected as controls. The groups were monitored bacteriologically by examination of cloacal swabs and organs and serologically by examination of serum and egg yolk by a lipopolysaccharide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay throughout the period. Within the first week, 100% of birds in both infected groups were excreting salmonella bacteria in the feces. However, the number of fecal excretors declined rapidly with time, down to 6% in 16 wk for S. typhimurium and down to a similar level within the first 8 wk for S. enteritidis. For the latter, relapses with up to 40% positive birds were observed at the onset of egg production. For both S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis, positive bacteriologic cultures were obtained by sampling from internal organs at the end of the experiment, more than 1 yr from the time of infection. At the age of 6-7 wk, 50% of the chickens in the two infected groups showed a measurable serologic response in serum samples. The response persisted throughout the study in both serum and egg yolk samples. The inclusion of serologic methods is a valuable additional tool in the detection of salmonella in poultry, but serology should be used in conjunction with bacteriologic methods in surveillance programs, in particular to detect flocks in early stages of infection before a measurable serologic response has been raised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061634     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0265:TSRTSE]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  5 in total

1.  Real-time monitoring of Salmonella enterica in free-range geese.

Authors:  L S Christensen; M H Josefsen; K Pedersen; J Christensen; L Bonnichsen; G Sørensen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Heterogeneity of persistence of Salmonella enterica serotype Senftenberg strains could explain the emergence of this serotype in poultry flocks.

Authors:  Zineb Boumart; Sylvie M Roche; Françoise Lalande; Isabelle Virlogeux-Payant; Christelle Hennequet-Antier; Pierrette Menanteau; Irène Gabriel; François-Xavier Weill; Philippe Velge; Marianne Chemaly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Salmonella control programs in Denmark.

Authors:  Henrik C Wegener; Tine Hald; Danilo Lo Fo Wong; Mogens Madsen; Helle Korsgaard; Flemming Bager; Peter Gerner-Smidt; Kåre Mølbak
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Comparisons of sampling procedures and time of sampling for the detection of Salmonella in Danish infected chicken flocks raised in floor systems.

Authors:  K O Gradel; J Andersen; M Madsen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Evaluation of a French ELISA for the detection of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium in flocks of laying and breeding hens.

Authors:  E Jouy; K Proux; F Humbert; V Rose; F Lalande; C Houdayer; J-P Picault; G Salvat
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 2.670

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.