Literature DB >> 12060428

The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs.

I Abrahamsson1, N U Zitzmann, T Berglundh, E Linder, A Wennerberg, J Lindhe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Findings from in vitro studies have indicated that the orientation and proliferation of cells on titanium surfaces may be influenced by the topography of the surface on which they are grown. It may be argued, therefore, that differences may occur in the mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface roughness. AIM: The present experiment was performed to study the composition of the soft tissue barrier that formed to implants prepared with well-defined smooth or rough surfaces.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five beagle dogs were used. Four implants made of c.p. titanium were placed in the right edentulous mandibular premolar region. After 3 months, two different types of abutments were connected: one experimental (OA) with a dual, thermal acid-etched surface ('Osseotite'), and one regular (RA) abutment with a 'turned' surface. At the end of a 6-month period during which proper plaque control had been maintained, biopsies including the implant and the surrounding soft and hard tissues were obtained, decalcified and processed for light and electron microscopy. A confocal He-Ne laser profilometer was used to study the surface topography of the abutments.
RESULTS: The attachment between the peri-implant mucosa and titanium abutments with either a turned (RA; 'smooth') or acid-etched (OA; 'rough') surface was similar from both a quantitative and a qualitative aspect. The attachment comprised a barrier epithelium and a zone of connective tissue attachment of similar dimension at RA and OA. It was further observed that the 'inner' zone of the connective tissue attachment at both types of abutment was composed of about 30-33% fibroblasts and 63-66% collagen.
CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that the soft tissue attachment that formed to implants made of c.p. titanium was not influenced by the roughness of the titanium surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12060428     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  28 in total

Review 1.  Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Andrea Bagno; Carlo Di Bello
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of CAD/CAM zirconia for implant-abutment manufacturing on gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes.

Authors:  A M Pabst; C Walter; A Bell; M Weyhrauch; I Schmidtmann; H Scheller; K M Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effects of hydrophilicity and microtopography of titanium implant surfaces on initial supragingival plaque biofilm formation. A pilot study.

Authors:  F Schwarz; A Sculean; M Wieland; N Horn; E Nuesry; C Bube; J Becker
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-12

4.  The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Akihiro Furuhashi; Yasunori Ayukawa; Ikiru Atsuta; Hideyuki Okawachi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Comparative assessment of the interfacial soft and hard tissues investing implants and natural teeth in the macaque mandible.

Authors:  Chong Huat Siar; Chooi Gait Toh; Georgios E Romanos; Kok Han Ng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Differentiation, apoptosis, and GM-CSF receptor expression of human gingival fibroblasts on a titanium surface treated by a dual acid-etched procedure.

Authors:  Luca Ramaglia; Gaetano Di Spigna; Gabriele Capece; Carolina Sbordone; Salvatore Salzano; Loredana Postiglione
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

8.  [Effect of different plasma treated zirconia on the adhensive behaviour of human gingival fibroblasts].

Authors:  M Zheng; L L Zhan; Z Q Liu; H P Li; J G Tan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-04-18

9.  The biological seal of the implant-soft tissue interface evaluated in a tissue-engineered oral mucosal model.

Authors:  Wen L Chai; Ian M Brook; Anders Palmquist; Richard van Noort; Keyvan Moharamzadeh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Various Surface Treatments to Implant Provisional Restorations and Their Effect on Epithelial Cell Adhesion: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Darya Luchinskaya; Rong Du; David M Owens; Dennis Tarnow; Nurit Bittner
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.