T Kvist1, C Reit. 1. Department of Endodontology and Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden. kvist@odontologi.gu.se
Abstract
AIM: There is substantial variation amongst dentists in the management of symptom-free periapical lesions in root-filled teeth. It has been suggested that this variation can be understood as clinicians' choice of different cut-off points on a continuous periapical health scale (the 'Praxis Concept (PC) theory'). Based on this suggestion, an individual's inclination to propose retreatment can be expressed in the Retreatment Preference Score (RPS). In the present study it was hypothesized that: (i) the PC theory is valid amongst experienced endodontists; and that (ii) interindividual variation in RPS can be explained by a corresponding variation in the perceived benefit of endodontic retreatment. METHODOLOGY: The RPS was determined for 16 experienced Swedish endodontists. The retreatment benefit (RTB) was defined as the gain in utility when a root-filled tooth with a persistent periapical lesion ('health state B') moved to a state where the lesion had healed ('health state A'). For each individual the utility values of the two health states were measured by means of the standard gamble technique. RESULTS: The RPS and RTB were found to be subjected to substantial inter- and intrarater variation. The decision makers acted in accordance with the PC theory. No significant correlation between RPS and RTB was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the PC theory is valid amongst endodontic experts. The study did not support the notion that the more potential utility that could be produced, the more the individual dentist should tend to perform retreatment. However, alternative consequentialist strategies focusing low risk taking may be involved.
AIM: There is substantial variation amongst dentists in the management of symptom-free periapical lesions in root-filled teeth. It has been suggested that this variation can be understood as clinicians' choice of different cut-off points on a continuous periapical health scale (the 'Praxis Concept (PC) theory'). Based on this suggestion, an individual's inclination to propose retreatment can be expressed in the Retreatment Preference Score (RPS). In the present study it was hypothesized that: (i) the PC theory is valid amongst experienced endodontists; and that (ii) interindividual variation in RPS can be explained by a corresponding variation in the perceived benefit of endodontic retreatment. METHODOLOGY: The RPS was determined for 16 experienced Swedish endodontists. The retreatment benefit (RTB) was defined as the gain in utility when a root-filled tooth with a persistent periapical lesion ('health state B') moved to a state where the lesion had healed ('health state A'). For each individual the utility values of the two health states were measured by means of the standard gamble technique. RESULTS: The RPS and RTB were found to be subjected to substantial inter- and intrarater variation. The decision makers acted in accordance with the PC theory. No significant correlation between RPS and RTB was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the PC theory is valid amongst endodontic experts. The study did not support the notion that the more potential utility that could be produced, the more the individual dentist should tend to perform retreatment. However, alternative consequentialist strategies focusing low risk taking may be involved.