Literature DB >> 25190267

Risk score algorithm for treatment of persistent apical periodontitis.

V S Yu1, L W Khin2, C S Hsu3, R Yee3, H H Messer4.   

Abstract

Persistent apical periodontitis related to a nonvital tooth that does not resolve following root canal treatment may be compatible with health and may not require further intervention. This research aimed to develop a Deterioration Risk Score (DRS) to differentiate lesions requiring further intervention from lesions likely to be compatible with health. In this cross-sectional study, patient records (2003-2008) were screened for root-filled teeth with periapical radiolucency visible on periapical radiographs taken at treatment and at recruitment at least 4 yr later. The final sample consisted of 228 lesions in 182 patients. Potential demographic and treatment risk factors were screened against 3 categorical outcomes (improved/unchanged/deteriorated), and a multivariate independent multinomial probit regression model was built. A 5-level DRS was constructed by summing values of adjusted regression coefficients in the model, based on predicted probabilities of deterioration. Most lesions (127, 55.7%) had improved over time, while 32 (14.0%) remained unchanged, and 69 (30.3%) had deteriorated. Significant predictors of deterioration were as follows: time since treatment (relative risk [RR]: 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.22, p = .030, rounded beta value = 1, for every year increase after 4 yr), current pain (RR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.48-9.70, p = .005, rounded beta value = 13), sinus tract present (RR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.11-15.29, p = .034, rounded beta value = 14), and lesion size (RR: 7.20, 95% CI: 3.70-14.02, p < .001, rounded beta value = 20). Persistent apical periodontitis with DRS <15 represented very low risk; 15-20, low risk; 21-30, moderate risk; 31-40, high risk; and >40, very high risk. DRS could help the clinician identify persistent apical periodontitis at low risk for deterioration, and it would not require intervention. When validated, this tool could reduce the risk of overtreatment and contribute toward targeted care and better efficiency in the timely management of disease. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; endodontics; periapical periodontitis; probability; regression analysis; root canal therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190267      PMCID: PMC4293765          DOI: 10.1177/0022034514549559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  30 in total

1.  The major factors that influence endodontic retreatment decisions.

Authors:  Anna Akerblom Rawski; Berndt Brehmer; Kerstin Knutsson; Kerstin Petersson; Claes Reit; Madeleine Rohlin
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2003

2.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase 1: initial treatment.

Authors:  Shimon Friedman; Sarah Abitbol; Herenia P Lawrence
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Periapical changes following root-canal treatment observed 20-27 years postoperatively.

Authors:  O Molven; A Halse; I Fristad; D MacDonald-Jankowski
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.264

4.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phase 4: initial treatment.

Authors:  Cristian de Chevigny; Thuan T Dao; Bettina R Basrani; Vincent Marquis; Mahsa Farzaneh; Sarah Abitbol; Shimon Friedman
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Treatment decisions in 330 cases referred for apical surgery.

Authors:  Thomas von Arx; Eliane Roux; Walter Bürgin
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.

Authors:  A Byström; G Sundqvist
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1981-08

7.  Management of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. A study on clinical decision making.

Authors:  C Reit; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  1984

Review 8.  On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review.

Authors:  P N R Nair
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  A survey of dentists' preferences for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.

Authors:  Amir Azarpazhooh; Thuan Dao; Rafael Figueiredo; Murray Krahn; Shimon Friedman
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Incidence and factors related to flare-ups in a graduate endodontic programme.

Authors:  M Iqbal; E Kurtz; M Kohli
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.264

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiologic assessment of quality of root canal fillings and periapical status in an Austrian subpopulation - An observational study.

Authors:  Andrej M Kielbassa; Wilhelm Frank; Theresa Madaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.