Literature DB >> 12058850

Attitudes to bioethical issues: a case study of a screening project.

U Gustafsson Stolt1, P E Liss, T Svensson, J Ludvigsson.   

Abstract

Commonly expressed in theoretical discussions about ethical problems in the context of epidemiology and screening is the need for more data. A study was carried out involving 21 explorative interviews with participant and nonparticipant mothers in a neonatal research screening project in progress in Sweden, ABIS (All Babies in Southeast Sweden). The respondents were asked, by way of open-ended questions, to give their opinions about certain ethical issues: informed consent; reasons for joining/declining; surrogate decision; the collection, analysis and storage of written and "live" material (biobanks); intervention etc. The ethical implications mentioned in the literature mostly concern the risk of creating distress and anxiety (anxiety and possible stigmatisation in respect of positive or false-positive results, worry about material collected and stored, distress caused by blood sampling procedures, etc.). Our results do not support the idea that the risks are substantial. The respondents rather indicate an attitude of benevolence--they are positive both to the current research on children, to the material they contribute (both written material and "biomaterial"), to possible results and intervention plans. On the other hand the participants expressed concern about the storage of material and the right to be informed of any screening/project results. Further studies in this field are needed and would be of help in theoretical discussion, the work of ethical committees and the designing of, for example, screening and research projects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12058850     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00099-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Parents' perspectives on participating in genetic research in autism.

Authors:  Magan Trottier; Wendy Roberts; Irene Drmic; Stephen W Scherer; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

Review 2.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

3.  Withdrawal from biobank research: considerations and the way forward.

Authors:  Kristina Hug; Göran Hermerén; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sharon H Baik; Mariana Arevalo; Clement Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Bioethical theory and practice in genetic screening for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  U Gustafsson Stolt; J Ludvigsson; P E Liss; T Svensson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics and individualizing drug treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  David M Haas
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 7.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.