Literature DB >> 12057876

Principles, organization, and operation of a DNA bank for clinical trials: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.

Philip W Lavori1, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Mary Brophy, Joel Buxbaum, Jennifer Cockroft, David R Cox, Louis Fiore, Henry T Greely, Harry Greenberg, Edward W Holmes, Lorene M Nelson, Jeremy Sugarman.   

Abstract

The mapping and sequencing of the human genome promises rapid growth in understanding the genetically influenced mechanisms that underlie human disease. To realize this promise fully, it is necessary to relate genetic information to clinical phenotypes. Genetic tissue banking in clinical studies provides opportunities to analyze the genetic contribution to variation in response to treatments. The challenges to progress are likely to come from the complex organizational, social, political, and ethical issues that must be resolved in order to put clinical and DNA bank information together. Concerns about subjects' rights, informed consent, privacy, and ownership of genetic material require attention in the development of DNA banks. In this paper we describe one approach to the solution of these problems that was adopted by one clinical trials group, the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12057876     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  10 in total

1.  Linking investigators. A centralized linking facility for data sharing and coordination of samples in tissue banks.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Bioethical considerations in developing a biorepository for the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health project.

Authors:  Andrea N DeLuca; Alan Regenberg; Jeremy Sugarman; David R Murdoch; Orin Levine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Pharmacogenetics, ethical issues: review of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report.

Authors:  O P Corrigan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Consent for genetics studies among clinical trial participants: findings from Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD).

Authors:  M A Espeland; K Dotson; S A Jaramillo; S E Kahn; B Harrison; M Montez; J P Foreyt; B Montgomery; W C Knowler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS): Overview and description.

Authors:  Amy C Justice; Elizabeth Dombrowski; Joseph Conigliaro; Shawn L Fultz; Deborah Gibson; Tamra Madenwald; Joseph Goulet; Michael Simberkoff; Adeel A Butt; David Rimland; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Cynthia L Gibert; Kris Ann K Oursler; Sheldon Brown; David A Leaf; Matthew B Goetz; Kendall Bryant
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Advances in pharmacogenomic research and development.

Authors:  Jeanette J McCarthy
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 7.  The endophenotype concept in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  Jonathan Flint; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Impact of apolipoprotein E genotypes on vitamin E and memantine treatment outcomes in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ilana Belitskaya-Lévy; Maurice Dysken; Peter Guarino; Mary Sano; Sanjay Asthana; Julia E Vertrees; Muralidhar Pallaki; Maria Llorente; Susan Love; Gerard Schellenberg
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-26

9.  Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases.

Authors:  David R Karp; Shelley Carlin; Robert Cook-Deegan; Daniel E Ford; Gail Geller; David N Glass; Hank Greely; Joel Guthridge; Jeffrey Kahn; Richard Kaslow; Cheryl Kraft; Kathleen Macqueen; Bradley Malin; Richard H Scheuerman; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Evaluating endophenotypes for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Riccardo Guglielmo; Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak; Gregor Hasler
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2021-05-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.