Literature DB >> 12053218

Higher morbidity and mortality after combined total gastrectomy and pancreaticosplenectomy for gastric cancer.

Su-Shun Lo1, Chew-Wun Wu, King-Han Shen, Mao-Chie Hsieh, Wing-Yiu Lui.   

Abstract

Total gastrectomy with pancreaticosplenectomy for gastric cancer has been proposed for facilitating lymph node dissection or for resection of direct tumor invasion to the pancreas, especially for T4 lesions. Its effectiveness in improving patient survival is still controversial, and higher morbidity and mortality with this procedure have been reported in several series. Such risks to patient survival were not observed in the Japanese series. Based on a prospective gastric cancer database maintained from 1987 to 1999 in our institution, the morbidity and mortality were analyzed in our series of pancreaticosplenectomies. A total of 1,278 patients with gastric cancer received gastrectomy in our surgical unit. Of these, 127 patients underwent curative total gastrectomy with pancreaticosplenectomy in order to facilitate lymph node dissection or removal of direct tumor invasion. Operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and surgical mortality were analyzed. Compared to another 201 total gastrectomies, longer mean operative time (7.91 +/- 2.16 hours vs. 6.67 +/- 2.01, p <0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (median, 24.5 days vs. 17, p <0.001) for combined organ resection (pancreaticosplenectomy) were shown in this series. The major complication rate, including intraabdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, postoperative bleeding, pancreatitis/fistula, chylous leak, and general complications causing unstable vital signs (26.8% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.001), but not the mortality rate (6.3% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.608), was also shown to be higher in pancreaticosplenectomy patients. The most frequent fatal complication was intraabdominal abscess. However, more than 50% of complications occurred in the first 40 pancreaticosplenectomies (1987-1991); after adequate accumulation of experience, the total complication rate (57.5% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.021), major complication rate (40% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.022), and mortality rate (17.5% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.001) improved significantly in the remaining 87 patients (1991-1999). We therefore conclude that total gastrectomy with pancreaticosplenectomy can be performed by experienced surgeons with acceptable risk of morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12053218     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0289-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

1.  No survival benefit from combined pancreaticosplenectomy and total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Kitamura; S Nishida; D Ichikawa; H Taniguchi; A Hagiwara; T Yamaguchi; K Sawai
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Use of a modified Foley catheter for continuous irrigation of intra-abdominal abscess.

Authors:  C W Wu; Y Chen; M J Hsieh; W Y Lui; F K P'eng
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Morbidity of radical lymphadenectomy in the curative resection of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  J W Smith; M H Shiu; L Kelsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-12

4.  Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study.

Authors:  M Degiuli; M Sasako; A Ponti; T Soldati; F Danese; F Calvo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; I Songun; J Hermans; M Sasako; K Welvaart; J T Plukker; P van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; C W Taat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Extended surgical resection in T4 gastric cancer.

Authors:  I B Shchepotin; V A Chorny; R J Nauta; M Shabahang; R R Buras; S R Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Chronologic changes in the clinicopathologic findings and survival of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  K Kitamura; T Yamaguchi; K Sawai; S Nishida; K Yamamoto; K Okamoto; H Taniguchi; A Hagiwara; T Takahashi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study.

Authors:  J R Siewert; K Böttcher; H J Stein; J D Roder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Complications following D3 gastrectomy: post hoc analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; I-Shou Chang; Su-shun Lo; Mao-Chin Hsieh; Jen-Hao Chen; Wing-Yiu Lui; Jacqueline Whang-Peng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [The value of postoperative ultrasonography].

Authors:  S Truong; J Grommes; J Conze; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Management of postoperative complications of lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Leandro Cardoso Barchi; Amir Zeide Charruf; Rodrigo José de Oliveira; Carlos Eduardo Jacob; Ivan Cecconello; Bruno Zilberstein
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-27

Review 4.  A systematic review of spleen and pancreas preservation in extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Savtaj S Brar; Rajini Seevaratnam; Roberta Cardoso; Calvin Law; Lucy Helyer; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications.

Authors:  Sumanta Dutta; Grant M Fullarton; Matthew J Forshaw; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effect of surgical work volume on postoperative complication: superiority of specialized center in gastric cancer treatment.

Authors:  Birendra Kumar Sah; Zheng Gang Zhu; Ming Min Chen; Ming Xiang; Jun Chen; Min Yan; Yan Zhen Lin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticosplenectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hiroshi Shimada; Hidetaka Ono; Yuichi Otsuka; Goro Matsuda; Masato Nomura; Hirotoshi Akiyama
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Post-operative complications of gastric cancer surgery: female gender at high risk.

Authors:  B K Sah; Z G Zhu; X Y Wang; Q M Yang; M M Chen; M Xiang; J Chen; M Yan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Gastric cancer surgery: Billroth I or Billroth II for distal gastrectomy?

Authors:  Birendra K Sah; Ming-Min Chen; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.