Literature DB >> 12052284

Warfarin versus aspirin in the secondary prevention of stroke: the WARSS study.

Andrea R Redman1, LaWanda C Allen.   

Abstract

The role of anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke has long been an area of debate. Previous evidence has shown that anticoagulation is unsafe at an International Normalized Ratio between 3.0 and 4.5. Results of the recently published Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS) suggest that there is no difference between warfarin and aspirin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke or death or in the rate of major hemorrhage. Differences in the therapeutic interventions used may have had an effect on the differences in endpoints achieved as compared with previous studies. Results of ongoing trials are anticipated to further clarify the role of anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052284     DOI: 10.1007/s11883-002-0011-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep        ISSN: 1523-3804            Impact factor:   5.113


  15 in total

Review 1.  Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke.

Authors:  G W Albers; P Amarenco; J D Easton; R L Sacco; P Teal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  AHA Scientific Statement. Supplement to the guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks: A statement from the Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks, Stroke Council, American Heart Association.

Authors:  G W Albers; R G Hart; H L Lutsep; D W Newell; R L Sacco
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  "Therapeutic range" for oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  J Hirsh; D Deykin; L Poller
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A J Azar; S C Cannegieter; J W Deckers; E Briët; P F van Bergen; J J Jonker; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  An analysis of the lowest effective intensity of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  E M Hylek; S J Skates; M A Sheehan; D E Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs. 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jan van Gijn; Ale Algra; Jaap Kappelle; Peter J Koudstaal; Anet van Latum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in outpatients taking warfarin.

Authors:  E M Hylek; D E Singer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischemia.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Management of carotid artery stenosis. Update for family physicians.

Authors:  George Louridas; Asad Junaid
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.