Literature DB >> 8782752

Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjusted-dose warfarin is highly efficacious for prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this treatment carries a risk of bleeding and the need for frequent medical monitoring. We sought an alternative that would be safer and easier to administer to patients with AF who are at high-risk of thromboembolism.
METHODS: 1044 patients with AF and with at least one thromboembolic risk factor (congestive heart failure or left ventricular fractional shortening < or = 25%, previous thromboembolism, systolic blood pressure of more than 160 mm Hg at study enrollment, or being a woman aged over 75 years) were randomly assigned either a combination of low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin (international normalised ratio [INR] 1.2-1.5 for initial dose adjustment) and aspirin (325 mg/day) or adjusted-dose warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0). Drugs were given open-labelled.
FINDINGS: The mean INR during follow-up of patients taking combination therapy (n = 521) was 1.3, compared with 2.4 for those taking adjusted-dose warfarin (n = 523). During follow-up, 54% of INRs in patients taking combination therapy were 1.2-1.5 and 34% were less than 1.2. The trial was stopped after a mean, follow-up of 1.1 years when the rate of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism (primary events) in patients given combination therapy (7.9% per year) was significantly higher than in those given adjusted-dose warfarin (1.9% per year) at an interim analysis (p < 0.0001), an absolute reduction of 6.0% per year (95% Cl 3.4, 8.6) by adjusted-dose warfarin. The annual rates of disabling stroke (5.6% vs 1.7%, p = 0.0007) and of primary event or vascular death (11.8% vs 6.4%, p = 0.002), were also higher with combination therapy. The rates of major bleeding were similar in both treatment groups.
INTERPRETATION: Low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin in this regimen is insufficient for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF at high-risk for thromboembolism; adjusted-dose warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) importantly reduces stroke for high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8782752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  196 in total

1.  Managing atrial fibrillation in elderly people. What should target international normalised ratio be?

Authors:  T Lancaster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-14

2.  Using anticoagulation or aspirin to prevent stroke. Research was methodologically flawed.

Authors:  S J Ellis; R Hans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

3.  Anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke. Warfarin reduces the risk by two thirds, but doctors still aren't prescribing it enough.

Authors:  S J Connolly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

Review 4.  Choices in medical management for prevention of acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  J D Fleck; J Biller
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Long term anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment. Only warfarin has been shown to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J G Cleland; G C Kaye
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

6.  The hemostatic effects of warfarin titration in post CABG patients in comparison to placebo treatment.

Authors:  J M Walenga; D Hoppensteadt; R Pifarré; N L Fox; S Forman; D B Hunninghake; L Campeau; J A Herd; B J Hoogwerf; A Hickey; J L Probstfield; M L Terrin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Very low-intensity antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  B G Koefoed; P Petersen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Chronic and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: course, prognosis, and stroke risk.

Authors:  T E Cuddy
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Risk factors for stroke and primary prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Laupacis; D Singer; A Jacobsen; M Dunn; J Dalen; G Albers
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Evidence based cardiology: Prevention of ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  H J Barnett; M Eliasziw; H E Meldrum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.