Literature DB >> 12051209

Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views.

Henk Schers1, Sophie Webster, Henk van den Hoogen, Anthony Avery, Richard Grol, Wil van den Bosch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known how patients value continuity for different health problems. In addition, it is not clear how different types of patients value continuity. It has been argued, for example, that young and healthy individuals have different ideas about continuity from older people with chronic illnesses. More extensive exploration of patients' views and expectations on personal continuity is important as this may help to organise general practice better in the future. AIM: To explore patients' views on continuity of care in general practice and their relations to patient characteristics. DESIGN OF STUDY: Postal questionnaire survey.
SETTING: Thirty-five general practices throughout The Netherlands.
METHOD: A sample of 25 patients from each practice was sent a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The response rate was 644/875 (74%). The percentage of patients feeling that it was important to see their personal doctor varied, from 21% for a splinter in the eye, to 96% for discussing the future when seriousy ill. The main reasons for preference of their own general practitioners (GPs) were the GP's assumed better medical knowledge of the patient and understanding of the personal and family background. Multiple linear regression analysis (GLM) showed that patient characteristics could explain 10% to 12% of the variance in these views on personal continuity.
CONCLUSION: The importance that patients attach to continuity of care depends on the seriousness of the conditions/facing them. Patients in The Netherlands desire a high level of personal care for serious conditions. Patient characteristics, such as age, sex, and frequency of visits to the GP influence views on continuity of care only to a minor extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12051209      PMCID: PMC1314320     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  22 in total

1.  The physician healer: ancient magic or modern science?

Authors:  D M Dixon; K G Sweeney; D J Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

Authors:  K E Kearley; G K Freeman; A Heath
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; T S Inui; W B Carter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Priority given by doctors to continuity of care.

Authors:  G Freeman
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-09

5.  Priorities in primary health care. The views of patients, politicians and health care professionals.

Authors:  E Hagman; T Rehnström
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A G Mainous; R Baker; M M Love; D P Gray; J M Gill
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J G Howie; D J Heaney; M Maxwell; J J Walker; G K Freeman; H Rai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

9.  A study of family practice in New York City.

Authors:  J S Schuman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Patients' priorities for medical care.

Authors:  R H Fletcher; M S O'Malley; J A Earp; T A Littleton; S W Fletcher; M A Greganti; R A Davidson; J Taylor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  45 in total

1.  Open-access versus bookable appointment systems: survey of patients attending appointments with general practitioners.

Authors:  Shane W Pascoe; Richard D Neal; Victoria L Allgar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Evaluation of advanced access in the national primary care collaborative.

Authors:  Mark Pickin; Alicia O'Cathain; Fiona C Sampson; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Saturday surgeries--do patients feel their needs can be met by alternative out-of-hours care? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Farah Chaudhry; Ashish Kapoor; Stephen Brant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Attachment in the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi Bøgelund Frederiksen; Jakob Kragstrup; Birgitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  The medical care practitioner: Newspeak and the duping of the public.

Authors:  Iona Heath
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Using markets to reform health care.

Authors:  Nigel Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-17

7.  Making general practice fit for the 21st century.

Authors:  David Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Access to and continuity of primary medical care of different providers as perceived by the Finnish population.

Authors:  Pekka Mäntyselkä; Pirjo Halonen; Arto Vehviläinen; Jorma Takala; Esko Kumpusalo
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Part-time relationships.

Authors:  Saul Miller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice.

Authors:  Heidi Bøgelund Frederiksen; Jakob Kragstrup; Gitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.