Literature DB >> 12050484

Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center.

G Vallancien1, X Cathelineau, H Baumert, J D Doublet, B Guillonneau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The development of laparoscopic surgery in urology is increasing rapidly. We describe our experience with complications during and after transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery after 9 years of practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,311 laparoscopic procedures were performed by 5 senior urologists in the same department since 1992, of which 72% were classified as difficult or very difficult (prostatectomy, nephrectomy for cancer, nephroureterectomy, partial nephrectomy, cystectomy, para-aortic lymph node dissection), 27.5% as moderately difficult (nephrectomy for benign disease, adrenalectomy, genitourinary prolapse, ureteropelvic junction, pelvic and ureteral stones, ureterovesical reimplantation, pelvic lymph node dissection) and 0.5% as easy (lymphocele, renal cyst and so forth).
RESULTS: There was no mortality or anesthetic complications. The overall transfusion rate was 2.4%. Complications were serious in 0.7% of cases, all of which required reoperation, intermediate in 1.8% of which 1% required reoperation and minor in 1.1%. The main complications were bowel (1.2%), vascular (0.5%) and ureteral injuries (0.8%). The conversion rate was 1.2% and the reoperation rate was 2.4%. Of the patients 1.2% had to be admitted to the intensive care unit. Postoperative complications were observed in 19% of cases. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with essentially the same complications as open surgery, and they, particularly bowel injuries and bleeding, can be diagnosed and often treated with repeat laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications during and after transperitoneal laparoscopy remain low and are not superior to those observed during and after open surgery. As laparoscopy becomes more widely used, urologists wishing to learn this technique must realize that the learning process is long but essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12050484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  40 in total

1.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The laparoscopic nephrectomy learning curve: a single centre's development of a de novo practice.

Authors:  J Phillips; J W F Catto; V Lavin; D Doyle; D J Smith; K J Hastie; N E Oakley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience.

Authors:  M Bruschi; S Micali; F Porpiglia; A Celia; S De Stefani; M Grande; R M Scarpa; G Bianchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Benjamin Lee; Michael C Truss; Hartwig Schwaibold; Martin Burchardt; Udo Jonas; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Laparoscopic renal surgery for benign disease.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Alberto Breda; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Michael C Truss; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Thilo Schwalenberg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Surgical pilgrimage - the need to avoid navigation through drains, medicine or 'medisin': our notes on NOTES.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Sneh Agarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Udaya Kumar; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Shortened OR time and decreased patient risk through use of a modular surgical instrument with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  David J Miller; Carl A Nelson; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.