Literature DB >> 12049587

Use of eye care and associated charges among the Medicare population: 1991-1998.

Leon B Ellwein1, Carol J Urato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the utilization and cost of eye care in the Medicare population.
METHODS: Data were obtained from fee-for-service physician claims (Part B) from a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Use of eye care services and procedures, frequency of ocular diagnoses, and allowed charges were compared for each year from 1991 through 1998.
RESULTS: The proportion of beneficiaries receiving eye care increased from 41.4% to 48.1% during the 8-year period. Part B charges attributable to eye care decreased from 12.5% to 10.4%, with annual inflation-adjusted charges per beneficiary decreasing from 235 dollars to 176 dollars (1998 dollars). The proportion of beneficiaries with cataract-related claims increased from 23.4% to 27.3%, accounting for approximately 60% of eye care charges each year; beneficiaries with retinal disease claims increased from 7.8% to 11.4%, capturing 15.4% of eye care charges in 1998, up from 10.7% in 1991; and beneficiaries with glaucoma claims increased from 6.8% to 9.5%, accounting for nearly 10% of eye care charges each year.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of the Medicare population receiving eye care increased between 1991 and 1998. Nevertheless, eye care costs did not increase, primarily because of constraints in charges associated with the management of cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049587     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  47 in total

1.  A class I (Senofilcon A) soft contact lens prevents UVB-induced ocular effects, including cataract, in the rabbit in vivo.

Authors:  Frank J Giblin; Li-Ren Lin; Victor R Leverenz; Loan Dang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Self assessed benefit of cataract extraction.

Authors:  N Congdon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records.

Authors:  Peggy L Peissig; Luke V Rasmussen; Richard L Berg; James G Linneman; Catherine A McCarty; Carol Waudby; Lin Chen; Joshua C Denny; Russell A Wilke; Jyotishman Pathak; David Carrell; Abel N Kho; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Risk of retinal detachment after cataract extraction, 1980-2004: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jay C Erie; Matthew E Raecker; Keith H Baratz; Cathy D Schleck; Dennis M Robertson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

5.  Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study.

Authors:  Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Masakazu Yamada; Yoko Akune; Akira Murakami; Annabelle A Okada; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Yuichi Ohashi; Naoya Yamagishi; Hiroshi Tamura; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tomoyuki Takura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Gabriel Chodick; Nural Bekiroglu; Michael Hauptmann; Bruce H Alexander; D Michal Freedman; Michele Morin Doody; Li C Cheung; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; André Bouville; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Visual acuity outcomes after cataract extraction in adult latinos. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Anne E Barañano; Joanne Wu; Kashif Mazhar; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison of various techniques for cataract surgery, their efficacy, safety, and cost.

Authors:  Parikshit Gogate
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09

9.  Vision health disparities in the United States by race/ethnicity, education, and economic status: findings from two nationally representative surveys.

Authors:  Xinzhi Zhang; Mary Frances Cotch; Asel Ryskulova; Susan A Primo; Parvathy Nair; Chiu-Fang Chou; Linda S Geiss; Lawrence E Barker; Amanda F Elliott; John E Crews; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Prevention of posterior capsular opacification through cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition.

Authors:  Heather L Chandler; Curtis A Barden; Ping Lu; Donna F Kusewitt; Carmen M H Colitz
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.