Literature DB >> 12047061

Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task.

C M Heyes1, C L Foster.   

Abstract

This study sought evidence of observational motor learning, a type of learning in which observation of the skilled performance of another person not only facilitates motor skill acquisition but does so by contributing to the formation of effector-specific motor representations. Previous research has indicated that observation of skilled performance engages cognitive processes similar to those occurring during action execution or physical practice, but has not demonstrated that these include processes involved in effector-specific representation. In two experiments, observer subjects watched the experimenter performing a serial reaction time (SRT) task with a six-item unique sequence before sequence knowledge was assessed by response time and/or free generation measures. The results suggest that: (1) subjects can acquire sequence information by watching another person performing the task (Experiments 1-2); (2) observation results in as much sequence learning as task practice when learning is measured by reaction times (RTs) and more than task practice when sequence learning is measured by free generation performance (Experiment 2, Part 1); and (3) sequence knowledge acquired by model observation can be encoded motorically--that is, in an effector-specific fashion (Experiment 2, Part 2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12047061     DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  42 in total

1.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

Review 3.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

6.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  David J Marcus; Canan Karatekin; Steven Markiewicz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

9.  Neural correlates of encoding and expression in implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  R D Seidler; A Purushotham; S-G Kim; K Ugurbil; D Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in corticospinal excitability associated with motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Michael Vesia; Cricia Rinchon; Robert Chen; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.