Literature DB >> 12045097

ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling.

Peter B Becker1, Wolfram Hörz.   

Abstract

It has been a long-standing challenge to decipher the principles that enable cells to both organize their genomes into compact chromatin and ensure that the genetic information remains accessible to regulatory factors and enzymes within the confines of the nucleus. The discovery of nucleosome remodeling activities that utilize the energy of ATP to render nucleosomal DNA accessible has been a great leap forward. In vitro, these enzymes weaken the tight wrapping of DNA around the histone octamers, thereby facilitating the sliding of histone octamers to neighboring DNA segments, their displacement to unlinked DNA, and the accumulation of patches of accessible DNA on the surface of nucleosomes. It is presumed that the collective action of these enzymes endows chromatin with dynamic properties that govern all nuclear functions dealing with chromatin as a substrate. The diverse set of ATPases that qualify as the molecular motors of the nucleosome remodeling process have a common history and are part of a superfamily. The physiological context of their remodeling action builds on the association with a wide range of other proteins to form distinct complexes for nucleosome remodeling. This review summarizes the recent progress in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the nucleosome remodeling reaction, the targeting of remodeling machines to selected sites in chromatin, and their integration into complex regulatory schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12045097     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem        ISSN: 0066-4154            Impact factor:   23.643


  285 in total

1.  A critical epitope for substrate recognition by the nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWI.

Authors:  Cedric R Clapier; Karl P Nightingale; Peter B Becker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics.

Authors:  Anton Eberharter; Peter B Becker
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins?

Authors:  Andrew A Travers
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Evidence for DNA translocation by the ISWI chromatin-remodeling enzyme.

Authors:  Iestyn Whitehouse; Chris Stockdale; Andrew Flaus; Mark D Szczelkun; Tom Owen-Hughes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Collaborative competition mechanism for gene activation in vivo.

Authors:  Joanna A Miller; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  R2 retrotransposition on assembled nucleosomes depends on the translational position of the target site.

Authors:  Junqiang Ye; Zungyoon Yang; Jeffrey J Hayes; Thomas H Eickbush
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  How versatile are inositol phosphate kinases?

Authors:  Stephen B Shears
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Positional cloning of the young mutation identifies an essential role for the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex in mediating retinal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Ronald G Gregg; Gregory B Willer; James M Fadool; John E Dowling; Brian A Link
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Conformational changes and catalytic inefficiency associated with Mot1-mediated TBP-DNA dissociation.

Authors:  Gregor Heiss; Evelyn Ploetz; Lena Voith von Voithenberg; Ramya Viswanathan; Samson Glaser; Peter Schluesche; Sushi Madhira; Michael Meisterernst; David T Auble; Don C Lamb
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Lsh, a modulator of CpG methylation, is crucial for normal histone methylation.

Authors:  Qingsheng Yan; Jiaqiang Huang; Tao Fan; Heming Zhu; Kathrin Muegge
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.