Literature DB >> 12044646

Gaze direction affects face perception in humans.

Shoko Watanabe1, Kensaku Miki, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

We recorded event-related potentials (ERP) in response to images of faces with a straight gaze (straight eyes) and eyes averted (averted eyes). Peak latencies of ERP components showed no significant change between straight eyes and averted eyes, but amplitude for averted eyes, particularly when averted to the right, was significantly larger than that for straight eyes at the lateral temporal electrode of the right hemisphere. Single-unit recordings in monkeys and neuroimaging studies in humans have revealed activity in the lateral temporal region, mainly the superior temporal sulcus, and a clinical study demonstrated the importance of the right hemisphere when viewing gaze direction. This is the first systematic neurophysiological report to confirm these findings using ERP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044646     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00257-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  18 in total

1.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study.

Authors:  Laura M Pönkänen; Annemari Alhoniemi; Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Atypical visual orienting to gaze- and arrow-cues in adults with high functioning autism.

Authors:  Petra H J M Vlamings; Johannes E A Stauder; Ilona A M van Son; Laurent Mottron
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2005-06

3.  Time course of superior temporal sulcus activity in response to eye gaze: a combined fMRI and MEG study.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Sakiko Yoshikawa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Effect of configural distortion on a face-related ERP evoked by random dots blinking.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Mika Teruya; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Social decisions affect neural activity to perceived dynamic gaze.

Authors:  Marianne Latinus; Scott A Love; Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Lisa Huang; Laurence Conty; Nathalie George; Karin James; Aina Puce
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; David Framorando; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Human cortical activity evoked by gaze shift observation: an intracranial EEG study.

Authors:  Fausto Caruana; Gaetano Cantalupo; Giorgio Lo Russo; Roberto Mai; Ivana Sartori; Pietro Avanzini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The shared signal hypothesis and neural responses to expressions and gaze in infants and adults.

Authors:  Silvia Rigato; Teresa Farroni; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Neurophysiological responses to faces and gaze direction differentiate children with ASD, ADHD and ASD+ADHD.

Authors:  Charlotte Tye; Evelyne Mercure; Karen L Ashwood; Bahare Azadi; Philip Asherson; Mark H Johnson; Patrick Bolton; Gráinne McLoughlin
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.