Literature DB >> 12044620

Psychophysical analysis of visceral and cutaneous pain in human subjects.

Irina A Strigo1, Catherine M Bushnell, Michel Boivin, Gary H Duncan.   

Abstract

Clinical evidence suggests that cutaneous and visceral pain differ in sensory, affective, and motivational realms, yet there has been little comparative characterization of these types of pain. This study uses psychophysical measures to compare directly visceral and cutaneous pain and sensitivity. Healthy subjects (10 males, seven females, age 19-29) evaluated perceptions evoked by balloon distention of the distal esophagus and contact heat on the upper chest. Subjects gave continuous ratings of pain intensity using an on-line visual analog scale (VAS), reported maximum pain intensity and unpleasantness on printed VASs, chose phrases from the McGill Pain Questionnaire and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and drew the area of perceived sensation. For esophageal distention, the threshold for pain intensity was higher than that observed for unpleasantness, whereas for contact heat, pain and unpleasantness thresholds did not differ for either phasic (10s) or tonic (36s) stimulus application. The relative unpleasantness, calculated as the difference between the unpleasantness and the intensity ratings, was higher during esophageal distention than during either phasic or tonic cutaneous heat; this difference in relative unpleasantness was seen at all intensities of esophageal stimulation. Subjects chose significantly more affective words and reported more anxiety during visceral pain than during phasic cutaneous heat pain. A similar tendency was observed when visceral pain was compared to tonic cutaneous heat pain. Subjects also chose a wider range of words to describe visceral than cutaneous pain. On-line VAS ratings revealed greater pain sensation after stimulus termination during visceral than during phasic cutaneous pain; likewise, a similar tendency was observed between visceral and tonic cutaneous pain. Finally, visceral pain led to a more spatially diffuse sensation and was referred to the entire chest and sometimes to the back. Our results show that visceral pain is more unpleasant, diffuse, and variable than cutaneous pain of similar intensity, independent of the duration of the presented stimuli. The data suggest the likelihood of both similarities and differences in the neural substrates underlying visceral and cutaneous pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044620     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00023-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  19 in total

1.  Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Dale J Langford; Andrea L Bailey; Mona Lisa Chanda; Sarah E Clarke; Tanya E Drummond; Stephanie Echols; Sarah Glick; Joelle Ingrao; Tammy Klassen-Ross; Michael L Lacroix-Fralish; Lynn Matsumiya; Robert E Sorge; Susana G Sotocinal; John M Tabaka; David Wong; Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg; Michel D Ferrari; Kenneth D Craig; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding?

Authors:  A R Hobson; Q Aziz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Pain and inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt; Brian Davis; David G Binion
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.325

4.  Does pain necessarily have an affective component? Negative evidence from blink reflex experiments.

Authors:  Claudia Horn; Yvonne Blischke; Miriam Kunz; Stefan Lautenbacher
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  The affective dimension of laboratory dyspnea: air hunger is more unpleasant than work/effort.

Authors:  Robert B Banzett; Sarah H Pedersen; Richard M Schwartzstein; Robert W Lansing
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 6.  New technologies to investigate the brain-gut axis.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Dina Lelic; Christina Brock; Peter Paine; Qasim Aziz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Brain imaging approaches to the study of functional GI disorders: a Rome working team report.

Authors:  E A Mayer; Q Aziz; S Coen; M Kern; J S Labus; R Lane; B Kuo; B Naliboff; I Tracey
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Postoperative discomfort (other than pain) - a neglected feature of postanesthesia patient care.

Authors:  Alexander Zegerman; Tiberiu Ezri; Avi A Weinbroum
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Increased affective bias revealed using experimental graded heat stimuli in young depressed adults: evidence of "emotional allodynia".

Authors:  Irina A Strigo; Alan N Simmons; Scott C Matthews; Arthur D Bud Craig; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Neuroimaging of Visceral Pain.

Authors:  Emily Johns; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Rev Pain       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.