Literature DB >> 12036974

Binocular visual acuity summation and inhibition in an ocular epidemiological study: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Stanley P Azen1, Rohit Varma, Susan Preston-Martin, Mei Ying-Lai, Denise Globe, Sora Hahn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize binocular visual acuity summation and inhibition in participants of a population-based ocular epidemiologic study.
METHODS: A complete ophthalmic examination of Latinos, aged 40 or more years, measured binocular and monocular distance visual acuities by a standard early-treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) protocol. The proportions of participants who demonstrated binocular summation (i.e., binocular visual acuity was better than the better eye visual acuity by five or more letters), binocular inhibition (i.e., binocular visual acuity was worse than the better eye visual acuity by five or more letters), and visual impairment (visual acuity worse than 20/40) were calculated.
RESULTS: In 1831 individuals, on average, binocular visual acuity was better than better eye visual acuity. Prevalence rates of binocular summation and inhibition were 21% and 2%, respectively. Compared with participants less than 65 years old or those with equivalent interocular visual acuity, older participants (> or =65 years) and those with interocular differences in visual acuity were more likely to demonstrate binocular inhibition (P < 0.01). The rate of visual impairment was significantly lower, when using binocular visual acuity than when using better eye or the American Medical Association (AMA) algorithm (5.2% vs. 6.9% and 9.5%, respectively P < 0.01). Participants with binocular inhibition had greater self-reported problems with driving activities (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The large proportion of individuals demonstrating binocular summation and inhibition suggests that in clinical or research settings, binocular visual acuity should be considered a primary measure of visual impairment, because it better equates the state in which the person usually functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  22 in total

1.  Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations.

Authors:  David C Musch; Leslie M Niziol; Brenda W Gillespie; Paul R Lichter; Nancy K Janz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Binocular inhibition in strabismic patients is associated with diminished quality of life.

Authors:  Anika K Tandon; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Joseph L Demer; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstöm-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  One eye or two: a comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Eileen E Birch; Lauren S Talman; David J Sackel; Elliot M Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Steven L Galetta; Maureen G Maguire; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Longitudinal changes in visual acuity and health-related quality of life: the Los Angeles Latino Eye study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Ron D Hays; Joanne Wu; Farzana Choudhury; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ying Wang; Joanne Wu; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Visual Acuity and Self-Reported Visual Function among Migrant Farmworkers.

Authors:  Sara A Quandt; Mark R Schulz; Haiying Chen; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Joanne Wu; Ron D Hays; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  SCORE2 Report 5: Vision-Related Function in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Maria J Figueroa; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Paul C VanVeldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Normative reference ranges for binocular summation as a function of age for low contrast letter charts.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Fei Yu; Joseph L Demer; Eileen Birch
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2014-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.