Literature DB >> 12036085

Different probe combinations for assessment of postzygotic chromosomal imbalances in human embryos.

Magdalena Bielanska1, Seang Lin Tan, Asangla Ao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared three different probe combinations for detection of postzygotic mosaic imbalances in human preimplantation embryos.
METHODS: Two hundred and two spare cleavage stage embryos were hybridized with fluorescently labelled DNA probe mixtures specific to chromosomes X, Y, 18 (N = 67), chromosomes 2, 7, 18 (N = 71), or chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22 (N = 64).
RESULTS: An overall higher incidence of abnormalities was detected using probe mixture for five (69%) or three (72%) autosomes compared to one autosome and chromosomes X and Y (54%). The rate of aneuploidy detected increased with the number of autosomes hybridized from 4% (X, Y, 18) to 11% (2, 7, 18) to 19% (13, 16, 18, 21, 22). Postzygotic mosaicism comprised the most frequent abnormality detected by all probe combinations, and the percentage detected by each was similar, 48% (X, Y, 18), 56% (2, 7,18), and 50% (13,16,18, 21, 22).
CONCLUSIONS: A probe combination of five autosomes, particularly those of clinical relevance, may be more beneficial for screening embryos from patients at risk of maternal-age-related aneuploidy. However, all three probe combinations are as efficient at identifying postzygotic mosaicism, and may be used for identifying embryos with less potential of developing to term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036085      PMCID: PMC3455654          DOI: 10.1023/a:1014842012261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  33 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-chromosome probes.

Authors:  Y Sasabe; K P Katayama; T Nishimura; A Takahashi; H Asakura; K Winchester-Peden; L Wise; Y Abe; H Kubo; S Hirakawa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Clinical experience of sex determination by fluorescent in-situ hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  C Staessen; E Van Assche; H Joris; M Bonduelle; M Vandervorst; I Liebaers; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Prevention of age-related aneuploidies by polar body testing of oocytes.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; J Cieslak; V Ivakhnenko; S Evsikov; G Wolf; M White; A Lifchez; B Kaplan; J Moise; J Valle; N Ginsberg; C Strom; A Kuliev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  D Wells; J K Sherlock; A H Handyside; J D Delhanty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos.

Authors:  S Munné; J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  A Pellicer; C Rubio; F Vidal; Y Mínguez; C Giménez; J Egozcue; J Remohí; C Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Potential use of repeated fluorescence in situ hybridization in the same human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  J Liu; Y L Tsai; X Z Zheng; T A Baramki; R A Yazigi; E Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Preimplantation genetic analysis of translocations: case-specific probes for interphase cell analysis.

Authors:  S Munné; J Fung; M J Cassel; C Márquez; H U Weier
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22.

Authors:  S Munné; C Magli; M Bahçe; J Fung; M Legator; L Morrison; J Cohert; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Abnormal early cleavage events predict early embryo demise: sperm oxidative stress and early abnormal cleavage.

Authors:  Victoria Burruel; Katie Klooster; Christopher M Barker; Renee Reijo Pera; Stuart Meyers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.