Literature DB >> 12035921

Responses to major categories of food chemicals by the lizard Podarcis lilfordi.

William E Cooper1, Valentín Pérez-Mellado, Laurie J Vitt.   

Abstract

Many lizards are capable of identifying food using only chemical cues from food surfaces, but almost nothing is known about the types of compounds that are effective stimuli. We experimentally studied lingual and biting responses by a lacertid lizard, Podarcis lilfordi, to single representatives of three major categories of food chemicals, sucrose as a carbohydrate, pure pork fat as a mixture of lipids, and bovine gamma globulin as a protein. In 60-sec trials in which stimuli were presented on cotton swabs, the lizards detected all three stimuli, exhibiting more tongue-flicks, licks, or bites, or a greater tongue-flick attack score (TFAS; overall measure of response strength to prey stimuli) than to deionized water. The initial response to all stimuli was tongue-flicking, but the lizards discriminated among the types of chemical stimuli. After preliminary tongue-flicks, the lizards responded to sucrose solutions by licking at high rates, to pure pork fat by biting, and to protein by a combination of additional tongue-flicks and biting. Biting is a feeding response to prey or solid plant material. Licking is a feeding response to sugars in nectar or ripe fruit. Its frequency increased with sucrose concentration. Our data suggest that lizards can identify several types of chemicals associated with food and direct feeding attempts to sources of such chemicals in the absence of visual cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12035921     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015280524788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  12 in total

1.  Location of fruit using only airborne odor cues by a lizard.

Authors:  W E Cooper; V Pérez-Mellado
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-10

2.  Chemosensory responses to sugar and fat by the omnivorous lizard Gallotia caesaris: with behavioral evidence suggesting a role for gustation.

Authors:  W E Cooper; V Pérez-Mellado
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-07

3.  Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous scincine lizards.

Authors:  W E Cooper; A M Al-Johany; L J Vitt; J J Habegger
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2000-10-01

4.  Tongue-flicking and biting in response to chemical food stimuli by an iguanid lizard (Dipsosaurus dorsalis) having sealed vomeronasal ducts: Vomerolfaction may mediate these behavioral responses.

Authors:  W E Cooper; A C Alberts
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. I. PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHEMORECEPTIVE RESPONSES TO PREY IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Food chemical discriminations by an herbivorous lizard, Corucia zebrata.

Authors:  W E Cooper
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2000-03-01

7.  Isolation from earthworms of a proteinaceous chemoattractant to garter snakes.

Authors:  D Wang; P Chen; X C Jiang; M Halpern
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Roles of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems in prey attack and feeding in adult garter snakes.

Authors:  M Halpern; N Frumin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1979-06

9.  Chemical-cue preferences of inexperienced snakes: comparative aspects.

Authors:  G M Burghardt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles.

Authors:  W E Cooper; G M Burghardt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola.

Authors:  Pilar López; Luisa Amo; José Martín
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.626

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.