OBJECTIVE: To determine the significance in patients with cirrhosis of small (<20 mm) hepatic nodules that show no hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images but that enhance during arterial phase MR imaging, we reviewed the cases of patients with such nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our review of radiology reports yielded 68 nodules in 40 patients with cirrhosis that showed no hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images but had rapid enhancement during arterial phase MR imaging after administration of a gadolinium contrast agent. Thirty-four patients (60 nodules) had multiple follow-up MR imaging examinations (range of length of follow-up, 1-72 months; average length of follow-up, 15 months 2 weeks). The final diagnosis of the nodule was determined by pathology reports or after at least 2 years of follow-up to ensure nodule stability and, therefore, benignity. Two radiologists independently reviewed MR images of the nodules, noting the size, signal intensity on T1- or T2-weighted images, and homogeneity of contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Nine (13%) of the 68 nodules were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The size of nodules on the first MR examination was between 4 and 20 mm (mean size, 9.5 mm). No significant correlation between the diagnosis of HCC and nodule signal intensity (p = 0.48) or contrast enhancement homogeneity (p = 0.56) on first MR examination was found. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing HCC on the basis of nodule growth were 100% and 98%, respectively. For diagnosing HCC on the basis of a change in nodule signal intensity, the PPV was 60% and the NPV was 91%. For diagnosing HCC on the basis of a change of enhancement homogeneity, the PPV was 63%, and the NPV was 94%. CONCLUSION: A finding of growth in small, early-enhancing nodules in patients with cirrhosis is highly predictive of HCC. When small nodules are observed on a single examination, close follow-up of the patient appears appropriate.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the significance in patients with cirrhosis of small (<20 mm) hepatic nodules that show no hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images but that enhance during arterial phase MR imaging, we reviewed the cases of patients with such nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our review of radiology reports yielded 68 nodules in 40 patients with cirrhosis that showed no hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images but had rapid enhancement during arterial phase MR imaging after administration of a gadolinium contrast agent. Thirty-four patients (60 nodules) had multiple follow-up MR imaging examinations (range of length of follow-up, 1-72 months; average length of follow-up, 15 months 2 weeks). The final diagnosis of the nodule was determined by pathology reports or after at least 2 years of follow-up to ensure nodule stability and, therefore, benignity. Two radiologists independently reviewed MR images of the nodules, noting the size, signal intensity on T1- or T2-weighted images, and homogeneity of contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Nine (13%) of the 68 nodules were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The size of nodules on the first MR examination was between 4 and 20 mm (mean size, 9.5 mm). No significant correlation between the diagnosis of HCC and nodule signal intensity (p = 0.48) or contrast enhancement homogeneity (p = 0.56) on first MR examination was found. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing HCC on the basis of nodule growth were 100% and 98%, respectively. For diagnosing HCC on the basis of a change in nodule signal intensity, the PPV was 60% and the NPV was 91%. For diagnosing HCC on the basis of a change of enhancement homogeneity, the PPV was 63%, and the NPV was 94%. CONCLUSION: A finding of growth in small, early-enhancing nodules in patients with cirrhosis is highly predictive of HCC. When small nodules are observed on a single examination, close follow-up of the patient appears appropriate.
Authors: Neil Mehta; Monika Sarkar; Jennifer L Dodge; Nicholas Fidelman; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: R Golfieri; E Marini; A Bazzocchi; F Fusco; F Trevisani; C Sama; G Mazzella; S Cavuto; F Piscaglia; L Bolondi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 3.469