Literature DB >> 12034316

Aromatic DNA adduct levels in coke oven workers: correlation with polymorphisms in genes GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1A1.

João Paulo Teixeira1, Jorge Gaspar, Gabriela Martinho, Susana Silva, Sónia Rodrigues, Olga Mayan, Elizabeth Martin, Peter B Farmer, José Rueff.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use DNA adducts levels, detected by 32P-postlabelling, as a biomarker to assess human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from a coke oven plant and explore the possible association between CYP1A1 MspI, GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes, and smoking status on bulky DNA adduct formation. A large amount of inter-individual variation in adduct level was observed among workers with the same job and the same smoking habits. No significant differences were observed in DNA adduct levels between the coke oven workers and control group. Smokers in the control group had significantly higher DNA adducts than the non-smokers in the same group (35.13+/-21.11 versus 11.18+/-8.00, per 10(8) nucleotides, P=0.003). In this group, the correlation between the level of DNA adducts and the cigarettes smoked was strongly significant (r=0.70, P<0.0005), but no correlation was found among the coke oven workers. Among non-smokers there was a significant difference between the control group and the coke oven workers (11.18+/-8.00 versus 24.62+/-15.20, per 10(8) nucleotides, P=0.03). These results suggests that tobacco smoke could behave as a confounding factor for evaluation of DNA adducts arising from occupational exposure. The levels of DNA adducts in smokers not occupationally exposed to PAHs is dependent on the polymorphisms CYP1A1 MspI in the 3' non-coding region (49.04+/-22.18 versus 25.85+/-15.87, per 10(8) nucleotides, P<0.05), but no effect was observed for the GST genotypes studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12034316     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00063-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  CYP1A1 genotype modifies the impact of smoking on effectiveness of HAART among women.

Authors:  David N Feldman; Joseph G Feldman; Ruth Greenblatt; Kathryn Anastos; Leigh Pearce; Mardge Cohen; Stephen Gange; Suzanne Leanza; Robbie Burk
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2009-06

Review 2.  Biomarkers of induced active and passive smoking damage.

Authors:  Maura Lodovici; Elisabetta Bigagli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Occupational Settings: Effect and Susceptibility Biomarkers in Workers From Lisbon Restaurants and Bars.

Authors:  Nádia Vital; Susana Antunes; Henriqueta Louro; Fátima Vaz; Tânia Simões; Deborah Penque; Maria João Silva
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04

4.  Primary DNA damage and genetic polymorphisms for CYP1A1, EPHX and GSTM1 in workers at a graphite electrode manufacturing plant.

Authors:  Massimo Moretti; Marco Dell'Omo; Milena Villarini; Roberta Pastorelli; Giacomo Muzi; Luisa Airoldi; Rossana Pasquini
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The role of GSTM1 gene polymorphisms in lung cancer development in Turkish population.

Authors:  Adalet Demir; Sedat Altin; Davut Pehlivan; Mulahim Demir; Fatih Yakar; Ekrem Cengiz Seyhan; Seyyit Ibrahim Dincer
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2007-09-26

6.  Significant association between decreased ALDH2 activity and increased sensitivity to genotoxic effects in workers occupationally exposed to styrene.

Authors:  Zuquan Weng; Megumi Suda; Mei Wan; Xing Zhang; Dongzhu Guan; Peiqing Zhao; Yuxin Zheng; Muneyuki Miyagawa; Rui-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-21

7.  Association of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms with risk of non-small cell lung cancer in Andhra Pradesh region of South India.

Authors:  Vidyullatha Peddireddy; Siva Prasad Badabagni; Sandhya Devi Gundimeda; Vasudha Mamidipudi; Pardhanandana Reddy Penagaluru; Hema Prasad Mundluru
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 8.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PAH-related DNA adducts.

Authors:  Błaszczyk Ewa; Mielżyńska-Švach Danuta
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.