Literature DB >> 12031057

Harnessing expertise: involving peer interviewers in qualitative research with hard-to-reach populations.

Eva Elliott1, Alison J Watson, Ursula Harries.   

Abstract

The use of peer interviewers with privileged access to a particular population group, which is difficult to reach via more conventional methods, has been acknowledged in recent research. This paper explores a number of key issues relating to the employment of peer interviewers by reflecting on a project designed to explore the views and experiences of parents who use illegal drugs. The project presented the research team with a number of challenges. These included the need to provide on-going support for the interviewers, a sense of distance felt by the researchers from the raw data they collected, and the difficulties of gaining from the skills and experiences of peer interviewers without exploiting their labour. The paper also explores the advantages of involving peer interviewers closely in research work and reflects on the nature and boundaries of expert knowledge that can become evident in such collaborations. The need for a certain amount of flexibility over the roles and domains of control that lay experts and researchers traditionally inhabit is suggested. In conclusion, it is argued that the involvement of peer interviewers in research can be a valuable means of enhancing our knowledge and understanding of a variety of population groups who tend to live beyond the gaze of more orthodox researchers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12031057      PMCID: PMC5060135          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of 'visible' and 'invisible' users of amphetamine, cocaine and heroin: two distinct populations?

Authors:  P Robson; M Bruce
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  The Swiss Hidden Population Study: practical and methodological aspects of data collection by privileged access interviewers.

Authors:  D Kuebler; D Hausser
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  The impact of self-presentation and interviewer bias effects on self-reported heroin use.

Authors:  J B Davies; R Baker
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1987-08

4.  Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues.

Authors:  P Griffiths; M Gossop; B Powis; J Strang
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.526

  4 in total
  27 in total

1.  'What difference does it make?' Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Steven Gillard; Rohan Borschmann; Kati Turner; Norman Goodrich-Purnell; Kathleen Lovell; Mary Chambers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  'You give us rangoli, we give you talk': using an art-based activity to elicit data from a seldom heard group.

Authors:  Sabi Redwood; Nicola K Gale; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  'The missing links': understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Sarah A Buckland; Helen Hayes; Maryrose Tarpey
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Gay Men's Understanding and Education of New HIV Prevention Technologies in Vancouver, Canada.

Authors:  Benjamin J Klassen; Nathan J Lachowsky; Sally Yue Lin; Joshua B Edward; Sarah A Chown; Robert S Hogg; David M Moore; Eric A Roth
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Hearsay Ethnography: Conversational Journals as a Method for Studying Culture in Action.

Authors:  Susan Cotts Watkins; Ann Swidler
Journal:  Poetics (Amst)       Date:  2009-04

7.  'Reaching the hard to reach'--lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community Sector). A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah M Flanagan; Beverley Hancock
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Implementing "insider" ethnography: lessons from the Public Conversations about HIV/AIDS project in rural South Africa.

Authors:  Nicole Angotti; Christie Sennott
Journal:  Qual Res       Date:  2014-07-23

10.  Exploring high mortality rates among people with multiple and complex needs: a qualitative study using peer research methods.

Authors:  Rachel Perry; Emma A Adams; Jill Harland; Angela Broadbridge; Emma L Giles; Grant J McGeechan; Amy O'Donnell; Sheena E Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.