Literature DB >> 12030550

Site-specific bone measurements in patients with ankle fracture.

B M Ingle1, R Eastell.   

Abstract

Ankle fracture is one of the most common fractures in adults, particularly postmenopausal women. Few studies have examined the bone mineral density (BMD) and ultrasound properties of bone close to the site of fracture in patients with ankle fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate these measurements in women with ankle fractures compared with controls. We studied 31 healthy post-menopausal women ages 50-79 years (mean age 63.2+/-3.3 years) from a population-based group and 31 postmenopausal women ages 52-76 years (mean age 61.2+/-2.2 years) with an ankle fracture. Distal tibia and fibula BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the Hologic QDR 1000/W densitometer. In addition to total distal and tibia BMD, three subregions were automatically selected: ultradistal, middle and one-quarter regions. Speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the calcaneus were measured using the Lunar Achilles+ (LA+) and CUBA Clinical (CC). In addition to SOS and BUA, LA+ Stiffness Index (SI) was also measured. The nondominant limb was measured in the population group and the contralateral limb in the ankle group. Differences between the groups were determined using t-tests. The ankle fracture group was heavier than the control group by an average of 10 kg. BMD measurements were therefore adjusted for weight. There were no significant differences between the ankle fracture and control groups in lumbar spine BMD, total or regional ankle BMD or calcaneal BUA. However, calcaneal SOS was decreased in the ankle fracture group when measured on the LA+ and CC by 50 m/s (-2.0 SD units, p<0.001) and 19 m/s (-0.5 SD units, p<0.01) respectively. LA+ SI was decreased in the ankle fracture group by 14 units (-1.1 SD units, p<0.001). In conclusion, ankle fracture is not a typical osteoporotic fracture. However, there may be structural changes in the bone (unrelated to bone density) which result in increased fragility and susceptibility to fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12030550     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  9 in total

1.  Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Michel Fortier; Heather Frame; André Lalonde; Alexandra Papaioannou; Vyta Senikas; Chui Kin Yuen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-02

2.  The dynamic vacuum orthosis: a functional and economical benefit?

Authors:  Jochen Franke; Sabine Goldhahn; Laurent Audigé; Henry Kohler; Andreas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Prior ankle fractures in postmenopausal women are associated with low areal bone mineral density and bone microstructure alterations.

Authors:  E Biver; C Durosier; T Chevalley; F R Herrmann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoporosis in otherwise healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women: physical and biochemical characteristics.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Pouillès; Florence A Trémollieres; Claude Ribot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Is ankle fracture related to low bone mineral density and subsequent fracture? A systematic review.

Authors:  Atiporn Therdyothin; Nacharin Phiphopthatsanee; Wiwat Wajanavisit; Patarawan Woratanarat; Sukij Laohajaroensombat; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-09-13

8.  The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture.

Authors:  L Bessette; L-G Ste-Marie; S Jean; K S Davison; M Beaulieu; M Baranci; J Bessant; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Factors influencing the treatment of osteoporosis following fragility fracture.

Authors:  L Bessette; S Jean; K S Davison; S Roy; L-G Ste-Marie; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.