Literature DB >> 12029192

Bioimpedance monitoring: better than chest x-ray for predicting abnormal pulmonary fluid?

W F Peacock1, N M Albert, P Kies, R D White, C L Emerman.   

Abstract

Bioimpedance monitoring may aid in treating heart failure. Mean thoracic electrical impedance (Zo) is inversely proportional to thoracic fluid volume and may offer greater sensitivity for detecting thoracic fluid. OBJECTIVE. Compare bioimpedance monitoring thoracic fluid detection to that of chest x-ray. METHOD. Prospective convenience sample. SETTING. 1000 bed teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS. Patients with suspected heart failure and shortness of breath. A single blinded radiologist interpreted chest x-rays as: normal, cardiomegaly, or abnormal pulmonary fluid. STATISTICS. General linear model with post hoc Bon Ferroni pairwise comparisons. RESULTS. 131 patients, mean age 66.8 years, 64.3% male, with an initial mean Zo=18 ohms. There was a significant difference (p<0.0002) between patients with cardiomegaly (Zo=17.5+/-5.5) or abnormal pulmonary fluid on chest x-ray (Zo=17.2+/-4.2) compared to normals (Zo=23.4+/-5.4). There was no difference between cardiomegaly and abnormal pulmonary fluid patients. CONCLUSION. Bioimpedance measurement may detect pulmonary fluid not apparent on chest radiograph. (c)2000 by CHF, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 12029192     DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2000.80141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congest Heart Fail        ISSN: 1527-5299


  9 in total

Review 1.  Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers.

Authors:  David J Wang; Stephen S Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2006-09

2.  Reduced thoracic fluid content in early-stage primary biliary cirrhosis that associates with impaired cardiac inotropy.

Authors:  Pawel Zalewski; David Jones; Ieuan Lewis; James Frith; Julia L Newton
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Measuring impedance in congestive heart failure: current options and clinical applications.

Authors:  W H Wilson Tang; Wilson Tong
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers.

Authors:  David J Wang; Stephen S Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Thoracic Fluid Content (TFC) Measurement Using Impedance Cardiography Predicts Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Lydia Sumbel; Aanchal Wats; Mohammed Salameh; Elumalai Appachi; Utpal Bhalala
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  Non-Invasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Lee S Nguyen; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-20

7.  Relationship Between Noninvasive Assessment of Lung Fluid Volume and Invasively Measured Cardiac Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Nir Uriel; Gabriel Sayer; Teruhiko Imamura; Daniel Rodgers; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Nitasha Sarswat; Sara Kalantari; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Daniel Burkhoff; Aharon Abbo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Effects of an outpatient intervention comprising nurse-led non-invasive assessments, telemedicine support and remote cardiologists' decisions in patients with heart failure (AMULET study): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Paweł Krzesiński; Ewa A Jankowska; Janusz Siebert; Agata Galas; Katarzyna Piotrowicz; Adam Stańczyk; Paweł Siwołowski; Piotr Gutknecht; Paweł Chrom; Piotr Murawski; Andrzej Walczak; Dominika Szalewska; Waldemar Banasiak; Piotr Ponikowski; Grzegorz Gielerak
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 17.349

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.