Literature DB >> 12028183

The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older.

Emese Somogyi-Zalud1, Zhenshao Zhong, Mary Beth Hamel, Joanne Lynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized patients aged 80 and older.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Four teaching hospitals in the United States that participated in the Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project (HELP). PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients aged 80 and older. MEASUREMENTS: We report the rates of admissions to intensive and coronary care units and the rates of use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), ventilators, right heart catheterization, artificial nutrition and hydration, surgical interventions, hemodialysis, and blood transfusions.
RESULTS: Of the 1,266 patients enrolled in HELP, 72 died during the enrollment hospitalization. The median age of those who died was 86 (range 83-89). Of the patients who died, the median number of activities of daily living impairments was two (range 1-4) before hospitalization, and 70% reported their baseline quality of life as fair or poor. Most patients who died had stated that they did not want aggressive care; 70% wanted their care focused on comfort rather than prolonging life, and 80% had a do-not-resuscitate order. However, the majority (63%) of the patients received one or more life-sustaining treatments before they died. Fifty-four percent were admitted to intensive or coronary care units, 43% were on a ventilator, 18% received CPR, 18% received tube feeding, 17% underwent surgery, 15% had right heart catheterization, 14% received blood transfusions, and 6% had hemodialysis. Intensive care did not affect survival time.
CONCLUSION: The use of life-sustaining treatments was prevalent in very old patients who died in the course of hospitalization, despite the fact that the majority had a preference for comfort care. This lack of congruence warrants further investigation and efforts to provide care that is more consistent with patients' preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project (HELP); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12028183     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50222.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  26 in total

1.  A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Jean-François Timsit; Luc Montuclard; Alain Colvez; Olivier Gattolliat; François Philippart; Guillaume Rigal; Benoit Misset; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Barriers to and enablers of advance care planning with patients in primary care: Survey of health care providers.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Carrie Bernard; Doug Klein; Dawn Elston; Amy Tan; Marissa Slaven; Doris Barwich; John J You; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Variation in prostate-specific antigen screening in men aged 80 and older in fee-for-service Medicare.

Authors:  Julie Bynum; Yunjie Song; Elliott Fisher
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The influence of age on the likelihood of receiving end-of-life care consistent with patient treatment preferences.

Authors:  John D Parr; Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Alexi Wright; Tracy Balboni; Edmund Duthie; Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Factors influencing ICU referral at the end of life in the elderly.

Authors:  R D Piers; D D Benoit; W J Schrauwen; N J Van Den Noortgate
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Opportunity lost: end-of-life discussions in cancer patients who die in the hospital.

Authors:  Mark C Zaros; J Randall Curtis; Maria J Silveira; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.

Authors:  JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff; Margaret Pisani; Elizabeth H Bradley; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The life-sustaining treatments among cancer patients at end of life and the caregiver's experience and perspectives.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Myung Kyung Lee; Yoon Jung Chang; Chang Hoon You; Samyong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Ho-Yeong Lim; Chang Geol Lee; Youn Seon Choi; Young Seon Hong; Si-Young Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Hyun Sik Jeong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Symptom Burden and End-of-Life Treatment Preferences in the Very Old.

Authors:  Steven M Albert; June R Lunney; Lei Ye; Robert Boudreau; Diane Ives; Suzanne Satterfield; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Susan M Rubin; Anne B Newman; Tamara Harris
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.