Literature DB >> 12027474

Impact of perioperative haemodynamic monitoring on cardiac morbidity after major vascular surgery in low risk patients. A randomised pilot trial.

M Bonazzi1, F Gentile, G M Biasi, S Migliavacca, D Esposti, M Cipolla, M Marsicano, F Prampolini, M Ornaghi, S Sternjakob, Y Tshomba.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate whether perioperative haemodynamic optimisation influences outcome from infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
METHODS: a consecutive series of 100 eligible patients were randomised to either haemodynamic optimisation through the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (CI > 3.0 l/min/sqm, PWP > 10 and <18 mmHg, SVR <1450 dyne/sec/cm(-5), DO(2)> 600 ml/min/sqm) or conventional treatment.
RESULTS: there were no differences in terms of in-hospital mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, postoperative renal failure or duration of hospital stay between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: in this study perioperative haemodynamic optimisation was not beneficial. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12027474     DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  19 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  [Pulmonary artery catheter in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine].

Authors:  U Schirmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Feng Dai; Alexandria Brackett; Yuhang Ai; Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariateresa Giglio; Lidia Dalfino; Filomena Puntillo; Giovanni Rubino; Massimo Marucci; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-24

8.  Swan-Ganz catheter use in trauma patients can be reduced without negatively affecting outcomes.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Kenji Inaba; Chrysanthos Georgiou; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Linda S Chan; Demetrios Demetriades; Randall Friese; Peter Rhee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Carlos Corredor; Nishkantha Arulkumaran; Gihan Abuella; Jonathan Ball; R Michael Grounds; Mark Hamilton; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Clinical review: What are the best hemodynamic targets for noncardiac surgical patients?

Authors:  Suzana Margareth Lobo; Neymar Elias de Oliveira
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.