Literature DB >> 12026944

Syntactic priming in English sentence production: categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study.

Martin Corley1, Christoph Scheepers.   

Abstract

To date, syntactic priming in sentence production has been investigated categorically, in terms of the probabilities of reusing particular syntactic structures. In this paper, we report a web-based replication of Pickering and Branigan (1998), Experiment 1, using a typed sentence completion paradigm that made it possible to record not only the responses made but also the response onset latency for each sentence completion. In conditions where priming occurred (as determined categorically), responses took less time when target completions were of the same type as preceding prime completions than when they differed. As well as validating Internet-based research by direct comparison with laboratory-based work, our findings strengthen the support for an architectural account of syntactic priming as envisaged by Pickering and Branigan.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12026944     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production.

Authors:  F Chang; G S Dell; K Bock; Z M Griffin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.

Authors:  H P Branigan; M J Pickering; A A Cleland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

3.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production.

Authors:  R J Hartsuiker; C Westenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

4.  Syntactic priming in written production: evidence for rapid decay.

Authors:  H P Branigan; M J Pickering; A A Cleland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

Review 5.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft.

Authors:  K Bock; H Loebell; R Morey
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Framing sentences.

Authors:  K Bock; H Loebell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-04
  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Effects of weight and syntactic priming on the production of cantonese verb-doubling.

Authors:  Elaine J Francis; Stephen Matthews; Reace Wing Yan Wong; Stella Wing Man Kwan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-02

2.  Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs?

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Kristin L Borreggine
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Syntactic priming: a corpus-based approach.

Authors:  Stefan Th Gries
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-07

4.  Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  The functions of structural priming.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2006-11

Review 6.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Between- and within-language priming is the same: evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations.

Authors:  Leila Kantola; Roger P G van Gompel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

8.  On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-05-04

9.  A paradox of syntactic priming: why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives.

Authors:  Katrien Segaert; Laura Menenti; Kirsten Weber; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Blogging as a viable research methodology for young people with arthritis: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Julie Prescott; Nicola J Gray; Felicity J Smith; Janet E McDonagh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.