Literature DB >> 12021939

Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review.

Hartwig Woldag1, Horst Hummelsheim.   

Abstract

In recent years, our understanding of motor learning, neuroplasticity and functional recovery after the occurrence of brain lesion has grown significantly. New findings in basic neuroscience provided stimuli for research in motor rehabilitation. Repeated motor practice and motor activity in a real world environment have been identified in several prospective studies as favorable for motor recovery in stroke patients. EMG initiated electrical muscle stimulation -- but not electrical muscle stimulation alone -- improves motor function of the centrally paretic arm and hand. Although a considerable number of physiotherapeutic "schools" has been established, a conclusive proof of their benefit and a physiological model of their effect on neuronal structures and processes are still missing. Nevertheless, evidence-based strategies for motor rehabilitation are more and more available, particularly for patients suffering from central paresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021939     DOI: 10.1007/s004150200058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  33 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler; Jay L Alberts; Min Wook Kim
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke.

Authors:  Ela Bhatt; Ashima Nagpal; Kristine H Greer; Tiffany K Grunewald; Jennifer L Steele; Jeff W Wiemiller; Scott M Lewis; James R Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Retention of motor changes in chronic stroke survivors who were administered mental practice.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Colleen Murray; Valerie Hermann; Peter Levine
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Motor imagery during movement activates the brain more than movement alone after stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lucy Dodakian; Jill Campbell Stewart; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nancy G Kutner; Rebecca Zhang; Andrew J Butler; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-02-25

Review 6.  Progress in sensorimotor rehabilitative physical therapy programs for stroke patients.

Authors:  Jia-Ching Chen; Fu-Zen Shaw
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Ellis; Theresa Sukal-Moulton; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Effect of baseline spastic hemiparesis on recovery of upper-limb function following botulinum toxin type A injections and postinjection therapy.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Chang; Michael C Munin; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Christian Niyonkuru; Lynne M Huber; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; A Ptito; M F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Henk A M Seelen; Richard D Willmann; Herman Kingma
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.