Jan Scott1, Marie Pope. 1. University of Glasgow, Scotland. jan.scott@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of nonadherence with mood stabilizers ranges from about 18% to 52%. Only 1% of publications on mood stabilizers address this issue. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and predictors of nonadherence in a cohort of individuals with affective disorders receiving long-term treatment with mood stabilizers. METHOD: Subjects receiving lithium, carbamazepine, and/or valproate were identified from biochemistry laboratory data. Ninety-eight of these subjects had major depressive disorder (N = 20) or bipolar disorder (N = 78) (DSM-IV) and gave informed consent to participate in a structured clinical interview to assess their medication adherence and the factors that influenced it. RESULTS: Just under 50% of subjects (46/98) acknowledged some degree of medication nonadherence in the previous 2 years, and 32% (29/92) reported only partial adherence in the last month (missing 30% or more of their prescribed medication). Backward stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that partially adherent subjects were best distinguished from adherent subjects by a more frequent past history of nonadherence, denial of severity of illness, and greater duration of being prescribed a mood stabilizer. CONCLUSION: Rates of mood stabilizer nonadherence are high. Attitudes and behaviors are better predictors of nonadherence than side effects from medication. Clinicians need to inquire routinely about problems with adherence.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of nonadherence with mood stabilizers ranges from about 18% to 52%. Only 1% of publications on mood stabilizers address this issue. This study aimed to explore the prevalence and predictors of nonadherence in a cohort of individuals with affective disorders receiving long-term treatment with mood stabilizers. METHOD: Subjects receiving lithium, carbamazepine, and/or valproate were identified from biochemistry laboratory data. Ninety-eight of these subjects had major depressive disorder (N = 20) or bipolar disorder (N = 78) (DSM-IV) and gave informed consent to participate in a structured clinical interview to assess their medication adherence and the factors that influenced it. RESULTS: Just under 50% of subjects (46/98) acknowledged some degree of medication nonadherence in the previous 2 years, and 32% (29/92) reported only partial adherence in the last month (missing 30% or more of their prescribed medication). Backward stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that partially adherent subjects were best distinguished from adherent subjects by a more frequent past history of nonadherence, denial of severity of illness, and greater duration of being prescribed a mood stabilizer. CONCLUSION: Rates of mood stabilizer nonadherence are high. Attitudes and behaviors are better predictors of nonadherence than side effects from medication. Clinicians need to inquire routinely about problems with adherence.
Authors: David J Moore; Carolina Posada; Mili Parikh; Miguel Arce; Florin Vaida; Patricia K Riggs; Ben Gouaux; Ronald J Ellis; Scott L Letendre; Igor Grant; J Hampton Atkinson Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-11
Authors: Martha Sajatovic; Jennifer Levin; Luis F Ramirez; David Y Hahn; Curtis Tatsuoka; Christopher S Bialko; Kristin A Cassidy; Edna Fuentes-Casiano; Tiffany D Williams Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.384